| Case name | Jurisdiction | Judge | Latest status |
| Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre GmbH et al v. ROSS Intelligence Inc. | D. Del. | Bibas | Summary Judgment Opinion 2025: REJECTS FAIR USE DEFENSE.
FINDS INFRINGEMENT.
I GRANT IN PART Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Direct Copyright Infringement and Related Defenses. I GRANT Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Fair Use. For those headnotes, the only remaining factual issue on liability is that some of those copyrights may have expired or been untimely created. This factual question underlying copyright validity is for the jury..
Summary Judgment Opinion 2023, partially rescinded or revised above |
| Getty Images (US), Inc. v. Stability AI Ltd | D. Del. | Hall | REQUEST for Oral Argument by Getty Images (US), Inc. re 45 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to Join a Party MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Over the Person, 48 MOTION to Transfer Case to Northern District of California. (Aug. 26, 2024)
Defendant’s Motion to Transfer
REPLY BRIEF re 48 MOTION to Transfer Case to Northern District of California filed by Stability AI (08/19/2024)
REDACTED VERSION of 55 Answering Brief in Opposition by Getty Images (US), Inc.. (08/21/2024)
OPENING BRIEF in Support re 48 MOTION to Transfer Case to Northern District of California filed by Stability AI (Jul. 29, 2024)
_________________________________
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss
REPLY BRIEF re 45 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to Join a Party MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Over the Person filed by Stability AI (Entered: 08/19/2024)
REDACTED VERSION of 54 Answering Brief in Opposition, by Getty Images (US), Inc.. (Vrana, Robert) (Entered: 08/21/2024)
OPENING BRIEF in Support re 45 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to Join a Party MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Over the Person filed by Stability AI (07/29/2024)
_________________________________
Second Amended Complaint (Jul. 8, 2024) |
| Vacker v. Eleven Labs, Inc. | D. Del. | Andrews | ORAL ORDER: A hearing regarding the Motion to Transfer Case to United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (D.I. 22 ) is now set for 3/12/2025, at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 6A. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 1/30/2025.
Plaintiffs. Opp. to transfer
Plainiffs Opp. to motion to dismiss
Defendant’s Motion to Transfer
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss
Complaint filed Aug. 29, 2024 |
| Doe 1 v. Github, Inc. | ND Cal. | Tigar | 9th Circuit Briefing Schedule for DMCA CMI claim 1202
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CERTIFY ORDER FOR INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL AND MOTION TO STAY PENDING APPEAL by Judge Jon S. Tigar, re: DMCA CMI 1202 claims (Sept. 27, 2024)
-prior order dismissing claims (Jun. 24, 2024)
_________________________________
NOTICE by J. DOE 1, J. DOE 2, J. Doe 3, J. Doe 4, J. Doe 5 OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY citing Andersen v. Stability AI partial denial of MTD (Aug. 15, 2024)
________________________________
REPLY (re 268 MOTION for Leave to Appeal PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1292(B) to OPENAI Opposition (filed Sept. 11, 2024)
REPLY (re 268 MOTION for Leave to Appeal PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1292(B) ) TO DEFENDANTS GITHUB AND MICROSOFTS OPPOSITION
OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re 268 MOTION for Leave to Appeal PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1292(B) ) filed byOAI (8/21/2024)*
OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re 268 MOTION for Leave to Appeal PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1292(B) ) filed byGitHub, Inc., Microsoft Corporation. (Filed on 8/21/2024)*
Motion for Interlocutory Appeal
*Reset Deadlines as to 268 MOTION for Leave to Appeal PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1292(B). Opposition due by 8/21/2024. Reply due by 9/11/2024.
______________________________
Order Granting and Denying in Part Motions to Dismiss First Am. Complaint (Jun. 24, 2024) (published)
_______________________________
Defendants moved to dismiss 2d amended complaint claims under 1202 of DMCA and breach of contract.
Judge Tigar granted in part Github, Microsoft’s motion to dismiss, leaving only 3 claims for breach of contract and unfair competition. [Summary] |
| Sarah Andersen v. Stability AI Ltd | ND Cal. | Orrick | DISCOVERY
Case referred to magistrate judge for discovery (Dec 10 2024)
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (Oct. 31, 2024)
– REDLINE VERSION
Plaintiffs Kelly McKernan and H.
Southworth pka Hawke Southworth voluntary dismissal (due to DMCA claims’ dismissal) (Nov. 21, 2024)
Judge Orrick Order granting and denying in part motion to dismiss First Am. Complaint (Aug. 12, 2024)
__________________________________
*Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge William H. Orrick:
Class Certification Motion and Motions for Summary Judgment to be heard on 11/4/2026.
Pretrial Conference set for 3/1/2027 02:00 PM and
Jury Trial set for 4/5/2027 08:30 AM, both in San Francisco, Courtroom 02, 17th Floor before Judge William H. Orrick.
_________________________________
STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION (dismissal of CMI claims in Doe 1 v. Github) pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3.d filed byMidjourney, Inc.. (Jul. 17, 2024)
Judge Orrick’s Tentative Rulings re MTD (May 7, 2024)
Runway Reply in supp. MTD (Apr. 18, 2024)
Runway Reply re Judicial Notice exhibits + webpages (Apr. 18, 2024)
DeviantArt Reply in supp. MTD (Apr. 18, 2024)
Stability AI Reply in supp. MTD (Apr 18, 2024)
Midjourney Reply in supp. MTD (Apr. 18, 2024)
Midjourney Reply re Judicial Notice exhibits + webpages (Apr. 18, 2024)*
Hearing: May 8, 2024, 2 PM PDT
Plaintiffs’ Opp. to Runway AI’s MTD (Mar. 21,2024)
Plaintiffs’ Opp. to DeviantArt’s MTD (Mar. 21, 2024)
Plaintiffs’ Opp. to Stability AI’s MTD (Mar. 21, 2024)
Plaintiffs’ Opp. to Midjourney’s MTD (Mar. 21, 2024)
Runway AI filed MTD (Feb. 8, 2024).
DeviantArt filed MTD (Feb. 8, 2024).
Stability AI filed MTD (Feb. 8, 2024).
Midjourney filed MTD (Feb. 8, 2024).
First Amended Complaint. |
In re Google Generative AI Copyright Litigation (consolidated cases)
Consolidating:
Zhang v. Google
Leovy v. Google | N.D. Cal. | Lee | Plaintiffs’ Opp. to Motion to Strike Class (Feb. 7, 2025)
Plaintiffs’ Opp. to Motion to Dismiss (Feb. 7, 2025)
Defendant’s Motion to Strike Class (Jan 17 2025)
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Jan. 17, 2025)
Consolidated Class Action Complaint (Dec. 20, 2024)
Scheduling Order
_________________________________
ORDER: The Court has reviewed Plaintiffs’ request to appoint interim class counsel 80 . The Court will hold the request in abeyance until the December 18, 2024, initial case management conference. Signed by Judge Eumi K. Lee on 11/21/2024.*
________________________________
Statement of Recent Decision citing Andersen v. Stability AI partial denial of MTD (Aug. 15, 2024)
________________________________
Motion to Dismiss by Google
Clerk’s Notice Setting Motion Hearing. 24 Motion to Dismiss Hearing set for 1/9/2025 at 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 10, 19th Floor before Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin.
REPLY (re 24 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof ) filed byAlphabet Inc., Google LLC.
Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Google’s Motion to Dismiss (Jul. 18, 2024)
Google’s Motion to Dismiss parts of Count I and all of Count II (Jun. 20, 2024)
Googles Motion Requesting Judicial Notice of Materials Incorporated by Reference in Supp. of Mtn. to Dismiss (Jun. 20, 2024)
_______________________________
Complaint filed on Apr. 26, 2024 |
Richard Kadrey v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
Consolidated with:
Chabon v. Meta Platforms
Farnsworth v. Meta Platforms
Huckabee v. Meta Platforms Inc
(dismissed without prejudice and tolling). *SDNY case v. Bloomberg ongoing
ND Cal. (transferred from SDNY) | ND Cal. | Chhabria | Judge Chhabria Order re: Crime-Fraud Exception and In-camera review of Meta attorney-client communications re seeding torrents (Feb. 4, 2025)
________________________________
Defendant’s Reply (2/18/25)
Plaintiffs’ Opp. to Motion to Dismiss
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
Third Am. Consolidated Complaint (Jan. 21, 2025)
_________________________________
Set Deadlines/Hearings: –
Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment due by 3/10/2025.
-Meta’s opposition, Meta’s motion for summary judgment, and Meta’s motions to exclude due by 3/24/2025.
-Plaintiffs’ reply in support of their motion for summary judgment, opposition to Meta’s motion for summary judgment, oppositions to Meta’s motions to exclude, and their motions to exclude due by 4/7/2025.
-Meta’s reply in support of its motion for summary judgment, and oppositions to the plaintiffs’ motions to exclude are due by 4/17/2025.
________________________________
AMENDED COMPLAINT Corrected Second Consolidated Amended Complaint against Meta Platforms, Inc.. (Straite, David) (Filed on 9/9/2024) Modified on 9/9/2024
__________________________________
STIPULATION AND ORDER: Voluntary Dismissal and Consolidation of Kadrey v. Meta and Huckabee v. Meta. Two Plaintiffs in the Kadrey action, Michael Chabon and Ayelet Waldman, hereby voluntarily dismiss their claims against Meta with prejudice. (Jul. 5, 2024)
Meta Answer (filed Jan. 10, 2024)
First Amended Complaint filed Dec. 11, 2023. |
In re OpenAI ChatGPT Litigation,
Case No. 23-cv-03223.
Consolidating:
Paul Tremblay v. OpenAI, Inc.
Sarah Silverman v. OpenAI, Inc.
Chabon v. OpenAI
| ND Cal. | Araceli Martinez-Olguin | NON-PARTY DARIO AMODEI’S OPPOSITION TO IN RE OPENAI AND AUTHORS GUILD PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS TO COMPEL DEPOSITION (2/14/25)
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Robert M. Illman: Discovery Hearing held on 2/11/2025. The court ruled as to dkt. 267 that the deposition of Mr. Mann will take place within the next two weeks for a total of seven hours split between the Plaintiffs in this case and the Authors Guild Plaintiffs. As to dkt. 267, by Wednesday February 19, 2025, the parties will file a joint statement regarding which issues, in any, remain in dispute related to the RFPs served on non-party Microsoft. (2/11/25)
MOTION to Compel Production of Documents from Non-Party Reuters News & Media Inc. filed by Paul Tremblay, Rachel Louise Snyder, Jacqueline Woodson, Sarah Silverman. Motion Hearing set for 3/18/2025 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Robert M. Illman. Responses due by 2/24/2025. Replies due by 3/3/2025
________________________________
ANSWER to Amended Complaint by OpenAI GP, L.L.C., OpenAI OpCo, L.L.C., OpenAI Startup Fund GP I, L.L.C., OpenAI Startup Fund I, L.P., OpenAI Startup Fund Management, LLC, OpenAI, Inc., OpenAI, L.P.. (Gratz, Joseph) (Filed on 8/27/2024) (Entered: 08/27/2024)
_________________________________
Order by Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin granting 172 Stipulation to Extend Case Deadlines. Substantial Completion of Document Productions due by 9/12/2024.
Close of Fact Discovery due by 1/27/2025.
Expert Reports due by 4/14/2025.
Opposing/Rebuttal Expert Reports due by 5/12/2025.
Close of Expert Discovery due by 6/11/2025.
Daubert Motions due by 7/9/2025. Opposition due by 5/12/2025.
Reply due by 6/11/2025.
Motion for Class Certification due by 7/9/2025.
Opposition due by 8/21/2025.
Reply due by 9/22/2025.
_________________________________
Defendants’ Statement of Recent Decision (in Doe 1 v. Github) (Jul. 12, 2024)
_______________________________
Defendants’ Reply in supp. MTD (Apr. 19, 2024)
-Hearing Aug. 1, 2024, 2 PM PDT
Plaintiffs’ Opposition to MTD (filed April 10, 2024)
OpenAI’s motion to dismiss 1st amended consolidated complaint (Mar. 27, 2024)
Plaintiffs’ First Consolidated Amended Complaint filed (Mar. 13, 2024)
Order Denying Motion by Tremblay to Enjoin Defendants from Litigating in SDNY
Order Granting in Part OpenAI’s motion to dismiss vicarious infringement claim, Section 1202 CMI claims, negligence, and unjust enrichment.
Pretrial Order No. 1 with stipulation and Order to consolidate cases |
| Bartz v. Anthropic, Inc. | N.D. Cal. | Alsup | ORDER ADOPTING STIPULATED
TRAINING DATA AND SOURCE
CODE INSPECTION PROTOCOL
(WITH PROVISO) (2/19/25)
STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING TRAINING DATA AND SOURCE CODE INSPECTION PROTOCOL (2/11/25)
Hearing re 64 Order on Stipulation: Tutorial Hearing set for 1/16/2025 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 12, 19th Floor
ORDER ADOPTING 62 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (WITH CONDITIONS). Signed by Judge Alsup (Nov. 18, 2024)
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER:
Final Pretrial Conference set for 11/19/2025 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 12, 19th Floor.
Jury Selection/Jury Trial set for 12/1/2025 07:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 12, 19th Floor before Judge William Alsup.
Amended Pleadings due by 12/4/2024.
Close of Fact Discovery due by 8/29/2025.
Motions due by 10/1/2025.
SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER TO ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE IN CIVIL CASES BEFORE JUDGE WILLIAM ALSUP. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2024)*
ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Anthropic PBC (Oct. 21, 2024).
Complaint filed (Aug 20, 2024) |
Millette v. OpenAI
(related case) | N.D. Cal. | Davila | Plaintiffs’ non-opposition to motion to dismiss state law claims (2/13/25)
OpenAI motion to dismiss state law claims (12/16/24)
ORDER GRANTING 53 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 10/30/2024. Motion to dismiss due by 12/16/2024. Opposition due by 2/7/2025. Reply due by 3/10/2025.
First Amended Complaint (Oct. 18, 2024)
_________________________________
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Some of Defendants OpenAI, L.P., OpenAI GP, L.L.C., OpenAI Startup Fund
I, L.P., OpenAI Startup Fund GP I, L.L.C., and OpenAI Startup Fund Management, LLC as not related to the litigation (Sept. 11, 2024)
Order Relating Case AND ~Util – Create Case Relationship (Aug. 28, 2024)
Case Management Scheduling Order (Aug. 15, 2024)
Complaint filed (Aug. 2, 2024) |
Millette v. Google
(related case) | N.D. Cal. | Davila | Google Motion to Dismiss (2/10/25)
First Am. Complaint (1/16/24)
Google’s Motion to Dismiss (Nov. 4, 2024)
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RULE 26(f) DEADLINES (LOCAL RULE 6-1(b)) [Oct. 1, 2024]
JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS
DEFENDANT ALPHABET INC.
WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO
FED. R. CIV. P. 41(A)(1)(A)(II)*
Order Relating Case AND ~Util – Create Case Relationship AND ~Util – Terminate Motions (Aug. 28, 2024)
Stipulation and Proposed Order (Aug. 30, 2024)
COMPLAINT filed on 8/2/2024 |
Millette v. NVIDIA
(related case) | N.D. Cal. | Davila | NVIDIA Motion to Dismiss (2/10/25)
First Am. Complaint (12/16/24)
NVIDIA Motion to Dismiss (Nov. 4, 2024)
Order Relating Case AND ~Util – Create Case Relationship AND ~Util – Terminate Motions (Aug. 28, 2024)
Complaint filed on Aug. 14, 2024 |
Abdi Nazemian v. NVIDIA Corp.
(related case) | N.D. Cal. | Tigar | DISCOVERY
Case Referred to Magistrate Judge for Discovery (2/14/25)
_________________________________
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE by Judge Jon S. Tigar. An Updated Joint Case Management Statement due by 5/2/2025. Further Case Management Conference set for 5/9/2025 at 01:30 PM – Videoconference Only.
PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on 01/08/2025.
ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION. (1/8/25)
_________________________________
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE CASE SCHEDULE by Judge Jon S. Tigar
Stipulated Deposition Protocol/Joint Brief due by 03/25/2025.
Amended Pleadings due by 4/15/2025.
Substantial Completion of Production due by 07/01/2025.
Complete Production of Privilege Logs due by 07/17/2025.
Close of Fact Discovery due by 11/20/2025.
Expert Reports due by 1/7/2026. Rebuttal Expert Reports due by 2/18/2026.
Service of Expert Reply Reports due by 04/01/2026.
Close of Expert Discovery due by 4/17/2026.
Summary Judgment and Daubert Motions due by 5/19/2026. Oppositions due by 6/16/2026. Replies due by 7/14/2026
ORDER allowing Defendant Nvidia Corporation’s request that the parties be allowed to file summary
judgment motions on the question of fair use prior to this Court’s consideration of whether to certify this case as a class action (Sept. 9, 2024)
________________________________
Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (Jul. 3, 2024)
Answer (May 24, 2024)
Complaint filed (Mar. 8, 2024) |
Dubus v. NVIDIA Corp.
(related case) | N.D. Cal. | Tigar | DISCOVERY
Case Referred to Magistrate Judge for Discovery (2/14/25)
_________________________________
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE by Judge Jon S. Tigar. An Updated Joint Case Management Statement due by 5/2/2025. Further Case Management Conference set for 5/9/2025 at 01:30 PM – Videoconference Only.
PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on 01/08/2025.
ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION. (1/8/25)
_________________________________
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE CASE SCHEDULE by Judge Jon S. Tigar re (70 in 4:24-cv-01454-JST) and (58 in 4:24-cv-02655-JST). Stipulated Deposition Protocol/Joint Brief due by 03/25/2025. Amended Pleadings due by 4/15/2025. Substantial Completion of Production due by 07/01/2025. Complete Production of Privilege Logs due by 07/17/2025. Close of Fact Discovery due by 11/20/2025. Expert Reports due by 1/7/2026. Rebuttal Expert Reports due by 2/18/2026. Service of Expert Reply Reports due by 04/01/2026. Close of Expert Discovery due by 4/17/2026. Summary Judgment and Daubert Motions due by 5/19/2026. Oppositions due by 6/16/2026. Replies due by 7/14/2026. (dms, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2024)
_________________________________
ANSWER to Complaint by NVIDIA Corporation. (7/1/2024)
Complaint filed May 2, 2024 |
In In Re Mosaic LLM Litigation
consolidating:
O’Nan v. Databricks, Mosaic ML
Makkai v. Databricks, Inc., Mosaic ML | N.D. Cal. | Breyer | DISCOVERY
Case referred to magistrate judge for discovery (2/18/25)
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: SCHEDULE MODIFICATION by Judge Charles R. Breyer: granting 81 Stipulation.Close of Fact Discovery due by 7/1/2025.
Close of Expert Discovery due by 10/9/2025.
Designation of Rebuttal Experts due by 9/4/2025.
Dispositive Motion due by 11/20/2025.
_________________________________
Order by Judge Charles R. Breyer granting 64 Motion to Appoint Interim Lead Counsel.
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES by Judge Charles R. Breyer
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER: The Court adopts the Joint Case Management Statement and Defendant’s Proposed Schedule. Case Management Conference set for August 2, 2024 is VACATED.
Case Management Conference set for 1/17/2024 at 8:30 AM in San Francisco – To be determined.
Close of Expert Discovery due by 7/25/2025.
Case Management Statement due by 1/10/2024.
Motions due by 9/5/2025. (Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 7/15/2024.)
DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO
COURT ORDER DIRECTING
RESPONSE RE: CASE SCHEDULE (Jul. 8, 2024)
The Court therefore ORDERS Defendants to file a response by July 8, 2024, indicating whether they consent to this approach (deciding summary judgment before class certification) and waive any objections to one-way intervention in this case (Jul. 1, 2024).
*Order finding Makkai v. Databricks is related case (May 13, 2024)*
*Defendants’ Answer (May 2, 2024)*
Complaint filed (Mar. 8, 2024) |
| Concord Music Group, Inc. et al v. Anthropic PBC | N.D. Cal. (transferred from M.D. Tenn.). | Lee | CLERK’S NOTICE RESETTING Further Case Management Conference. Further Case Management Conference reset for 3/12/2025 at 01:30 PM before Judge Eumi K. Lee. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom meeting.
OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re 295 MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Authority ) filed by Anthropic (2/12/25)
MOTION for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Authority filed by Capitol CMG, Inc (2/11/25)
_________________________________
ORDER Granting as Modified 297 Stipulated Protocol for Producing Documents and Electronically Stored Information. (2/13/25)
ORDER Granting as Modified 292 Stipulated Protective Order
_________________________________
NOTICE by Anthropic PBC of Anthropic PBC’s Technology Tutorial Demonstratives (Nov. 22, 2024)*
________________________________
JOINT SCHEDULING ORDER AS MODIFIED. Signed by Judge Eumi K. Lee on 11/7/2024. (lrt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2024) (Entered: 11/07/2024)
_________________________________Motion to Dismiss
*REPLY (re 205 MOTION to Dismiss ) filed byAnthropic PBC. (Sept. 17, 2024)
OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re 205 MOTION to Dismiss ) filed by Plaintiffs (Sept. 5, 2024)*
MOTION to Dismiss filed by Anthropic PBC. Motion to Dismiss Hearing set for 10/10/2024 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 08, 19th Floor. Responses due by 9/5/2024. Replies due by 9/17/2024.
_________________________________
MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
ORDER granting 290 Stipulation REGARDING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION MOTION. Signed by Judge Eumi K. Lee (lrt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/2/2025)
Defendant Anthropic PBC’s Surresponse to Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Oct. 23, 2024)
RESPONSE re 241 Objection to Reply Evidence by Abkco Music Inc, (Filed on 9/26/2024)
Order Granting Motion for Leave to File (Sept. 24, 2024)
MOTION for Leave to File (Civil L.R. 7-3(d)) filed by Abkco Music Inc, (Sept 23, 2024)
OBJECTIONS to Reply Evidence Re 225 REPLY (re 179 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction) (Local Rule 7-3(d)) by Anthropic PBC.
REPLY (re 179 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction ) (Redacted) filed by Plaintiffs (Sept. 12, 2024)*
MOTION to File Amicus Curiae Brief filed by Chamber of Progress, NetChoice, LLC. Responses due by 9/12/2024. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Proposed Order)(Tuttle, Eric) (Filed on 8/29/2024),
– attached amicus brief
OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re 179 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction ) (Redacted) filed byAnthropic PBC (Sept. 22, 2024)
MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Abkco Music Inc, Capitol CMG, Inc., Concord Music Group, Inc., Polygram Publishing, Inc., Songs of Universal Inc., Universal Music – MGB NA LLC, Universal Music – Z Tunes LLC, Universal Music Corp..
Prpoosed Amici Brief (Aug. 5, 2024) by RIAA and Other Trade Groups
_______________________________
From M.D. Tennessee:
ORDER:
*The Clerk shall TRANSFER this action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California and close the case. Signed by District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 6/24/2024
Anthropic’s Motion to Dismiss (Nov. 22, 2023)
Plaintiffs’ Response (Jan. 22, 2024)
Anthropic’s Reply (Feb. 14, 2024)
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Nov. 16, 2023)
Anthropic’s opposition (Jan. 15, 2024)
Plaintiffs’ Reply (Feb. 14, 2024)
COMPLAINT against Anthropic PBC (Oct. 18, 2023) |
| Alcon Entertainment v. Tesla | C.D. Cal. | Wu | ORDER by Judge George H Wu. On February 13, 2025, Plaintiff Alcon Entertainment, LLC filed a First Amended Complaint. In light of that filing, the Operative Complaint is no longer the original complaint. As such, the Court VACATES Defendants Tesla, Inc. and Elon Musk’s Motion to Dismiss 22, and Defendant Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss 23, both filed on February 4, 2025 (2/14/25)
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (2/13/25)
STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE JUDGE GEORGE H. WU by Judge George H Wu, You are instructed to read and to follow (unless otherwise superseded herein) the Central District of California Local Rules (henceforth Local Rules) 16-1 through 16-15 regarding pre-trial requirements.
COMPLAINT (Oct. 21, 2024) |
Authors Guild v. Open AI
consolidated with
Alter v. OpenAI, Microsoft, formerly Julian Sancton v. OpenAI, Microsoft
consolidated with Authors Guild v. OpenAI
plus Basbanes v. Microsoft below
aka “Authors Action” | SNDY | Stein | DISCOVERY DISPUTES
ORDER (1/24/25)
JOINT LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang from Rachel Geman, Rohit Nath and Scott J. Sholder dated January 17, 2025 re: chart containing disputes that are ripe for discussion at the January 22 conference.
ORDER denying without prejudice 306 Letter Motion to Compel; granting 308 Letter Motion to Compel.(1/21/25)
_________________________________
DEPOSITION COORDINATION?
LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang from Rachel Geman, Rohit Nath and Scott J. Sholder dated February 13, 2025 re: Update on Deposition Coordination Negotiations. (2/13/25)
LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang from R. James Slaughter and Sheryl K. Garko dated February 13, 2025 re: to provide an update on the parties continued efforts to come to an agreement on a deposition coordination protocol, and to request a further settlement conference on this issue. (2/13/25)
JOINT RESPONSE re: (312 in 1:23-cv-08292-SHS-OTW, 268 in 1:23-cv-10211-SHS-OTW) Letter (1/17/25)
_________________________________
Defendants’ Discovery Objection Per FRCP 72(a)
REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: (300 in 1:23-cv-08292-SHS-OTW) Objection (non-motion), . Document filed by OpenAI Inc., (1/27/25)
Microsoft Reply (1/27/25)
OPPOSITION BRIEF of Plaintiffs (1/17/25)
MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: (300 in 1:23-cv-08292-SHS-OTW, 256 in 1:23-cv-10211-SHS-OTW) Objection (non-motion), // Memorandum of Law in Support of OpenAI Defendants’ Objection to Nondispositive Order Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a). Document filed by OpenAI Inc. (12/23/2024)
ORDER denying 232 Letter Motion for Local Rule 37.2 Conference. The discovery dispute relates to Defendants’ fair use defense and is denied for the reasons identified in ECF 344 in the related Newspaper Cases (23-cv-11195). Additionally, the request is denied as premature: this dispute relates to interrogatories requesting that Plaintiffs identify certain documents that may relate to Defendants’ fair use defense. (12/3/24)
__________________________________
Order staying Basbanes v. OpenAI (see below) (Sept. 30, 2024)
__________________________________
ORDER on discovery disputes (Sept. 13,
2024)
Stipulation & Order Re: Discovery of Electronically Stored Information (Sept. 13, 2024)
__________________________________
The interim fact discovery deadline for all cases is hereby EXTENDED to April 30, 2025. The deadline to amend the complaint for all cases is hereby EXTENDED to April 15, 2025. (12/6/24)
_________________________________
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for General Pretrial (includes scheduling, discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, and settlement). Referred to Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Sidney H. Stein on 8/6/2024) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:23-cv-08292-SHS, 1:23-cv-10211-SHS, 1:24-cv-00084-SHS (jca) (Entered: 08/06/2024)
_________________________________
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER…regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material…SO STIPULATED AND AGREED. The protective order may be amended for good cause. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Sidney H. Stein on 5/15/2024) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:23-cv-08292-SHS, 1:23-cv-10211-SHS, 1:24-cv-00084-SHS (jca) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
Answer filed by OpenAI (Feb. 16, 2024)
Answer filed by Microsoft (Feb. 16, 2024)
CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT filed (Feb. 2, 2024). |
Basbanes v. Microsoft
consolidated for pretrial purposes pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 42. with Authors Guild v. OpenAI above
[stayed pending joint submission within 2 weeks of ruling on class certification] | SDNY | Stein | Stayed:
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING BASBANES LITIGATION. NOW, THEREFORE, in the interests of effectuating the Court’s prior rulings, and adding further clarity and efficiency into the schedule, it is here by Stipulated and Ordered as follows: 1. The Rule 23 allegations in the Basbanes Complaint, Basbanes Dkt. No. 1, namely, Paragraphs 120-132 and Paragraphs 149 (a)-(c), are hereby DISMISSED; 2. Within two weeks of a ruling on class certification in the consolidated class action litigation brought by the Author Plaintiffs, counsel for the Basbanes Plaintiffs and counsel for Defendants will confer regarding future proceedings, if any, for the Basbanes litigation and submit a joint statement to the Court within one week of the aforementioned conferral; and 3. The Basbanes case is STAYED pending issuance of a Court order following the joint submission referenced in Paragraph 2 above. SO ORDERED.
Complaint filed (Jan. 5, 2024) |
New York Times v. Microsoft
consolidated with Daily News and The Center for Investigative Reporting lawsuits below
aka “Newspapers Action” | SDNY | Stein | Court certification re: NY state law unconstitutional claim by Microsoft (2/3/25)
_________________________________
Discovery re NYT use of AI and other issues
OpenAI REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: (362 in 1:23-cv-11195-SHS-OTW) Objection (non-motion) .(1/27/25)
Microsoft Reply (1/27/25)
OpenAI REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 371 Objection (non-motion) to Discovery Orders at ECF 352-53.
RESPONSE re: 371 Objection (non-motion), 368 Notice (Other), PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ OBJECTIONS TO NONDISPOSITIVE ORDER PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 72(A). (1/23/25)
***SELECTED PARTIES*** MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 371 Objection (non-motion) to Discovery Orders at ECF 352-53. Document filed by OpenAI (12/23/24)
MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: (166 in 1:24-cv-04872-SHS-OTW, 230 in 1:24-cv-03285-SHS-OTW, 368 in 1:23-cv-11195-SHS-OTW) Notice (Other), Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Microsofts Rule 72(a) Objections to Discovery Orders Refusing Inquiry into Evidence of Economic Effects and Technology Uses Relevant to Defenses of Fair Use and Substantial Noninfringing Uses (12/23/24)
Magistrate Judge Wang’s Order denying OpenAI’s motion to compel discovery of New York Times’ use of AI (Nov. 22, 2024) re: 236 LETTER MOTION for Conference to Compel
__________________________________
Discovery disputes
Letter re Chart of Disputes (2/13/25)
__________________________________
Deposition Coordination?
Letter re: deposition coordination protocol, and to request a further settlement conference
on this issue. (2/13/25)
Letter from Zachary Savage re Deposition Coordination (2/13/25)
LETTER MOTION for Discovery re Deposition Protocol addressed to Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang from Ian B. Crosby and Steven Lieberman dated October 15, 2024. Document filed by Chicago Tribune Company
*BRIEF in Support of Proposed Order for Deposition Coordination. Document filed by Microsoft Corporation, OAI Corporation LLC, OpenAI (10/15/24) (seeks deposition coordination in book author cases and newspapers cases v. OpenAI
_______________________________
Order on discovery disputes (Sept. 13, 2024)
*STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: TRAINING DATA INSPECTION PROTOCOL Upon the stipulation of the parties, the following protocol will apply to the inspection, review, and/or disclosure of Training Data produced by Defendants
STIPULATED SOURCE CODE ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the forgoing Agreement is approved. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 9/30/24)
__________________________________
Order allowing prior MTD to apply to FAC (Aug. 20, 2024)
First Amended Complaint (Aug. 12, 2024)* [many exhibits]
_______________________________
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for General Pretrial (includes scheduling, discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, and settlement). Referred to Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang and Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Sidney H. Stein on 8/6/2024)*
________________________________
NOTICE of Supplemental Authority [Doe 1 v. Github] re: 51 MOTION to Dismiss (Jul. 12, 2024)
NOTICE of Supplemental Authority re: 124 LETTER MOTION to Compel The New York Times Company to Produce Documents addressed to Judge Sidney H. Stein from Joseph R. Wetzel dated May 23, 2024.(Jun. 25, 2024)
——————————————————————–
Stipulated Protective Order (May 31, 2024)
_________________________________
New York Times Letter re; Warner Chappell v. Nealy decision (May 9, 2024)
——————————————————————–
Microsoft reply to Opp. to MTD (May 3, 2024)
Microsoft reply to New York Times Opp. (Mar. 25, 2024)
OpenAI reply to New York Times Opp. (Mar. 18, 2024)
New York Times opposition to OpenAI’s motion to dismiss (Mar. 18, 2024)
Defendant filed motion to dismiss (Feb. 26, 2024).
Complaint filed (Dec. 28, 2023) |
Daily News v. Microsoft
consolidated with New York Times v. Microsoft above | SDNY | Stain | See New York Times v. Microsoft for recent developments in discovery
__________________________________
MOTION TO DISMISS
Microsoft’s REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 76 MOTION to Dismiss Counts IV, V, VI, and VIII. . Document filed by Microsoft Corporation (Jul. 2, 2024)
OpenAI Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion (Jul. 2, 2024)
PLAINTIFFS’ MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: [80] MOTION to Dismiss . OpenAI Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. Document filed by Chicago Tribune Company, LLC, DP Media Network, LLC, Daily News LP, Northwest Publications, LLC, ORB Publishing, LLC, Orlando Sentinel Communications Company, LLC, San Jose Mercury-News, LLC, Sun-sentinel Company, LLC..(June 25, 2024)
MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 80 MOTION to Dismiss (6/11/24)
Complaint filed April 30, 2024 |
The Center for Investigative Reporting, Inc. v. OpenAI
consolidated with New York Times v. Microsoft above | SDNY | Stain | See New York Times v. Microsoft for recent developments in discovery
_________________________________
Consolidation
ORDER denying (261) Letter Motion for Discovery; denying without prejudice (284) Letter Motion to Compel in case 1:23-cv-11195-SHS-OTW; denying (158) Letter Motion for Discovery in case 1:24-cv-03285-SHS-OTW; ORDER granting (256) Motion to Consolidate Cases 23-cv-11195 (as Lead Case) with 24-cv-4872; granting (256) Motion to Consolidate Cases 23-cv-11195 (as Lead Case) with 24-cv-4872 in case 1:23-cv-11195-SHS-OTW; granting (152) Motion to Consolidate Cases 23-cv-11195 (as Lead Case) with 24-cv-4872; granting (152) Motion to Consolidate Cases 23-cv-11195 (as Lead Case) with 24-cv-4872 in case 1:24-cv-03285-SHS-OTW. The Court held a status conference on these matters on October 30, 2024. For the reasons stated on the record, it is hereby ORDERED: Defendants’ motion to consolidate (ECF 256) Case No. 24-cv-4872 (Center for Investigative Reporting, Inc. v. OpenAI, Inc., et al.) with Case No. 23-cv-11195 and consolidated cases (24-cv-3285) is GRANTED.
__________________________________
MOTION TO DISMISS
*REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 99 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint. . Document filed by OpenAI, Inc., OpenAI GP, LLC, OpenAI, LLC, OpenAI OpCo LLC, OpenAI Global LLC, OAI Corporation, LLC, OpenAI Holdings, LLC..(Gass, Andrew) (Entered: 11/19/2024)*
*REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 96 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint. . Document filed by Microsoft Corporation..(Hurst, Annette) (Entered: 11/19/2024)*
*PLAINTIFF CENTER FOR
INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING’S
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE (Oct. 18, 2024)*
Microsoft and OpenAI’s MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: (152 in 1:24-cv-03285-SHS-OTW, 152 in 1:24-cv-03285-SHS-OTW) MOTION to Consolidate Cases 1:24-cv-04872-UA . . Document filed by Microsoft Corporation, OAI Corporation, LLC, to consolidate NYT, Daily News, and Center for Investigative Reporting Lawsuits (Oct. 4, 2024)
__________________________________
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (Sept. 24, 2024)
Order on discovery disputes (Sept. 13, 2024)
Complaint filed (Jun. 27, 2024) |
| Dow Jones & Co. (WSJ/NY Post) v. Perplexity AI | SDNY | Polk Failla | Second Amended Complaint (1/28/25)
Defendant will file its Motion to Dismiss by no later than February 18, 2025;
Plaintiffs will file their opposition to the Motion to Dismiss by no later than March 11, 2025; and
Defendant will file its reply in further support of its Motion to Dismiss by no later than March 25, 2025
Complaint filed (Oct. 21, 2024) |
| Huckabee v. Bloomberg | SDNY | Garnett | NOTICE of Supplemental Authority. Document filed by Bloomberg Finance, L.P., Bloomberg L.P.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A – Recent Case Decision).(Jantzi, Nicole) (Entered: 08/22/2024)
MEMO ENDORSED ORDER granting 94 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. ENDORSEMENT: Application GRANTED. Lisa M. Geary’s Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Plaintiffs is hereby GRANTED. (Jul. 1, 2024)
________________________________
Huckabee response that oral argument is not necessary (May 14, 2024)
Bloomberg letter requesting oral argument (May 7, 2024)
Bloomberg Reply (May 3, 2024)
Defendants’ Opp. to motion to dismiss (Apr. 19, 2024)
Bloomberg motion to dismiss (Mar. 22, 2024)
Plaintiffs’ opposition to the motion to dismiss shall be due April 19, 2024; Defendants’ reply in support of their motion to dismiss shall be due May 3, 2024.
It is further ORDERED that discovery shall be stayed during the pendency of briefing on the motion to dismiss. Any party seeking to lift the stay on discovery may seek such relief by letter to the Court filed on ECF after Defendants’ reply is submitted. |
| Raw Story Media, Inc. v. OpenAI | SDNY | McMahon | REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 118 MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Complaint (1/21/25)
OpenAI’s Opp. to Motion to file First Am. Complaint (12/20/24)
MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 118 MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Complaint . . Document filed by Raw Story Media, Inc., (Nov. 21, 2024)
–Exhibit Proposed First Amended Complaint (redline)
DECISION AND ORDER granting 68 Motion to Dismiss. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED in its entirety. Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to replead is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to renewal on a proper record- which means filing a notice of motion to which a proposed amended pleading is attached together with an explanation of why the proposed amendment would not be futile. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 11/7/24) BY ECF TO ALL COUNSEL (yv) (Entered: 11/07/2024)*
_________________________________
[PROPOSED] STIPULATION & ORDER RE: DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY
STORED INFORMATION (Sept. 24, 2024)
AMENDED [PROPOSED]
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
WITH COMPLETE
CONFIDENTIALITY ADDENDUM (Sept. 24, 2024)
DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY
IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS (Aug. 22. 2024)
PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER. (Aug. 20, 2024)
________________________________
REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER:Pursuant to the Parties’ joint request to modify and extend the case schedule, and good cause appearing, it is hereby ordered that the case schedule is modified as reflected in the “New Deadline” column in the table below.
Motions due by 6/16/2025.
Responses due by 7/11/2025
Replies due by 7/25/2025.
Fact Discovery due by 5/22/2025. Expert Discovery due by 5/22/2025. Pretrial Order due by 8/6/2025. (And as further set forth herein.)
__________________________________
NOTICE of Supplemental Authority.filed by OpenAI re The Intercept Open re leave to amend to add specific allegations (Jun. 10, 2024)
REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 68 MOTION to Dismiss . . Document filed by OAI Corporation, LLC, OpenAI GP LLC, OpenAI Global LLC, OpenAI Holdings, LLC, OpenAI Inc., OpenAI LLC, OpenAI OpCo LLC..(Gratz, Joseph) (Entered: 05/20/2024)
Plaintiffs’ Opposition to MTD (May 13, 2024)
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (April 29, 2024)
Complaint filed (Feb. 28, 2024) |
| Intercept Media Inc. v. OpenAI | SDNY | Rakoff | Defendant’s Answer to Amended Complaint (12/5/24)
ORDER with respect to 49 Motion to Dismiss; with respect to 52 Motion to Dismiss. An Opinion explaining the reasons for this ruling will issue in due course. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close docket entry numbers 49 and 52. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jed S. Rakoff on 11/21/2024
_________________________________
NOTICE of Supplemental Authority. Document filed by The Intercept Media, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1).(Match, Stephen) (Entered: 08/27/2024)*
NOTICE of Supplemental Authority re: 52 MOTION to Dismiss .. Document filed by OAI Corporation (Aug 22, 2024)*
OpenAI’s SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 52 MOTION to Dismiss (Jul. 8, 2024)
Microsoft’s SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 49 MOTION to Dismiss (Jul. 8, 2024)
First Amended Complaint (Jun. 21, 2024)
ORDER: Accordingly, plaintiff must file an amended complaint by Friday, June 21, 2024. Defendants may then file a supplemental brief in support of their motions to dismiss by Monday, July 8, 2024; the Court will treat defendants’ already filed motions as aimed at the amended complaint. Plaintiff may then file a supplemental brief in opposition to the renewed motions to dismiss by Monday, July 15, 2024. The Court will then promptly rule on the motions. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jed S. Rakoff on 6/6/2024)
Miicrrosoft Reply in support of MTD (May 16, 2024)
OpenAI Reply in support of MTD (May 16, 2024)
Plaintiff’s Opposition to MTD (May 6, 2024)
OpenAI motion to dismiss (Apr. 15, 2024)
Microsoft motion to dismiss (Apr. 15, 2024)
Supplemental Rule 26(f) report and Proposed Case Management Plan (filed April 2, 2024)
Complaint filed (Feb. 28, 2024) |
| UMG Recordings v. Uncharted Labs d/b/a/ Udio | SDNY | Hellerstein | MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: 69 Letter Special Master Report filed by James C. Francis IV (1/21/25)
STIPULATED SOURCE CODE PROTOCOL
CONFIDENTIALITY STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER
JOINT PRE-CONFERENCE STATEMENT REGARDING PROTECTIVE ORDER, ESI PROTOCOL, AND WRITTEN DISCOVERY DEADLINES. (Sept. 19, 2024)
_________________________________
CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN: After consultation with counsel for the parties, the following Case Management Plan is adopted. This plan is also a scheduling order pursuant to Rules 16 and 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. A. The case is to be tried to a jury. Completion of Document Production May 14, 2025.
Amended Pleadings due by 3/25/2025. Joinder of Parties due by 1/17/2025. Case Management Conference set for 5/28/2025 at 02:30 PM before Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein.
_________________________________
Answer by Udio (Aug. 1, 2024)
Complaint filed (Jun. 24, 2024) |
| Lerhman v. Lovo, Inc. | SDNY | Oetken | Motion to dismiss 1st am. complaint
Defendant’s reply (1/31/25)
Plaintiffs’ opposition to motion to dismiss (1/10/25)
Defendantt’s motion to dismiss (11/25/24)
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT amending 1 Complaint against Lovo, Inc. with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Paul Lehrman, Linnea Sage, John Doe. (Sept. 25, 2024)
__________________________________
CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER: This case is to be tried to a jury. Counsel for the parties have conferred and their present best estimate of the length of trial is 6 days. The parties shall file a joint status letter no later than the deadline for fact discovery, currently June 30, 2025.
Deposition due by 6/30/2025.
Fact Discovery due by 6/30/2025. Expert Discovery due by 8/15/2025. (Judge J. Paul Oetken on 8/12/2024)
Complaint (May 16, 2024) |
| Advance Local Media v. Cohere | SDNY | McMahon | Complaint (2/13/25) |
| UMG Recordings v. Suno | D. Mass. | Saylor IV | Pproceedings held before Magistrate Judge Paul G. Levenson: Discovery conference held on 2/14/2025. The parties shared their positions with respect to various discovery disputes. The parties are to confer further in light of the Court’s guidance and update the Court on the status of their conferrals by 2/21/2025.
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED SOURCE CODE PROTOCOL
STIPULATED ORDER RE:
DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION
__________________________________
AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER ENTERED:
Written discovery (requests for production of documents, interrogatories and request for admissions) shall be served no later than 4/30/25.
All depositions, other than expert depositions, and fact discovery must be completed by 7/15/25.
Trial experts must be disclosed by 8/26/25.
Rebuttal experts by 9/23/25.
Trial experts must be deposed by 11/5/25.
Dispositive Motions must be filed by 12/5/25.
NOTICE OF HEARINGS:Status Conference set for 6/5/2025 at 3:00 PM by telephone before Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor IV
_________________________________
Answer by Suno (Aug. 1, 2024)
Complaint filed (Jun. 24, 2024) |
| Peirce v. Photobucket | D. Colo. | Mag. Judge N. Reid Neureiter | Complaint filed (12/11/24) |
