-
Thomson Reuters responds to ROSS Intelligence letter re: United States Statement of Interest on fair use
Read more: Thomson Reuters responds to ROSS Intelligence letter re: United States Statement of Interest on fair useThomson Reuters has files its reply to ROSS Intelligence’s 28(j) letter discussing the United States’ Statement of Interest on fair use. Thomson Reuters: Related Stories:
-
ROSS Intelligence informs Third Circuit of United States’ Statement of Interest in OpenAI suits
Read more: ROSS Intelligence informs Third Circuit of United States’ Statement of Interest in OpenAI suitsThe United States’ Statement of Interest in the OpenAI MDL litigation is beginning to ripple through the other AI copyright suits. ROSS Intelligence just filed a Rule 28(j) letter of new authority, calling the Third Circuit panel’s attention to the United States’ positions on fair use explained in the Statement. Other AI companies will likely…
-
Audio of Oral argument in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS Intelligence
Read more: Audio of Oral argument in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS IntelligenceToday the Third Circuit heard oral argument in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS Intelligence. Here is the audio: Related Story:
-
Live stream for oral argument in Third Circuit in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS Intelligence. 1st appeals court to review fair use in AI training.
Read more: Live stream for oral argument in Third Circuit in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS Intelligence. 1st appeals court to review fair use in AI training.The Third Circuit will live stream the oral argument for the interlocutory appeal in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS Intelligence on Thursday, June 11, 10 AM ET. (There are 3 cases on the calendar — and the exact order is not necessarily the same as the calendar listings.) Click here to go to the live stream…
-
Parties in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS Intelligence submit dueling questions posed by appeal before Third Circuit
Read more: Parties in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS Intelligence submit dueling questions posed by appeal before Third CircuitWe are nearing the June 11 oral argument in the all-important appeal in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS Intelligence. The parties submitted their formulation of the question presented: SUMMARY OF ORAL ARGUMENT submitted by Attorney Mark S. Davies, Esq. for Appellant Ross Intelligence Inc. Case Summary: Is a short quote or paraphrase of judicial holding copyrightable…
-
Third Circuit panel announced in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS Intelligence appeal: Judges Restrepo, Montgomery-Reeves, and Bove. Argument on June 11, 10 AM
Read more: Third Circuit panel announced in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS Intelligence appeal: Judges Restrepo, Montgomery-Reeves, and Bove. Argument on June 11, 10 AMThe Third Circuit officially announced the panel for the interlocutory appeal in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS Intelligence: The oral argument is on June 11, 10 AM in Philadelphia, as the Third Circuit announced: To learn more about the issues and read the briefs:
-
Thomson Reuters, ROSS Intelligence disagree on meaning of Third Circuit’s ASTM v. UpCodes in supplemental briefs asked by Third Circuit
Read more: Thomson Reuters, ROSS Intelligence disagree on meaning of Third Circuit’s ASTM v. UpCodes in supplemental briefs asked by Third CircuitThe Third Circuit asked the parties in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS Intelligence for supplemental briefs (on top of the supplemental letters) on how the Third Circuit’s own fair use decision in American Society for Testing & Materals v. UpCodes applies to their case. The fact that the Third Circuit has now 2 fair use appeals…
-
Third Circuit orders Thomson Reuters, ROSS Intelligence to file supplemental briefs on Third Circuit’s recent decision finding likely fair use by UpCodes
Read more: Third Circuit orders Thomson Reuters, ROSS Intelligence to file supplemental briefs on Third Circuit’s recent decision finding likely fair use by UpCodesThe Clerk of the Third Circuit just posted an order by the Third Circuit in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS Intelligence, an interlocutory appeal over (1) whether Westlaw headnotes used by ROSS were copyrightable expression (or lacked originality) and (2) whether ROSS’s use of some headnotes to train its AI model was a fair use: “At…
-
Thomson Reuters tries to distinguish Third Circuit’s UpCodes fair use decision
Read more: Thomson Reuters tries to distinguish Third Circuit’s UpCodes fair use decisionThomson Reuters submitted its reply to ROSS Intelligence’s 28(j) letter of supplemental authority based on the Third Circuit’s recent fair use decision in American Society for Testing & Materials v. UpCodes, Inc. involving a for-profit, AI-native startup company‘s republication of building codes that some jurisdictions have adopted as law. Despite some salient factual similarities, Thomson Reuters argues that…
-
Thomson Reuters disputes ROSS Intelligence’s AI case implicates national security interest
Read more: Thomson Reuters disputes ROSS Intelligence’s AI case implicates national security interestThomson Reuters filed a letter in the Third Circuit disputing ROSS Intelligence’s claim that its case involving fair use in AI training implicates national security interests. Here’s Thomson Reuters’ letter: