-
Stunner. Judge Bibas grants ROSS Intelligence motion to certify fair use & copyrighability of headnotes to Third Circuit for interlocutory appeal. Wow.
Read more: Stunner. Judge Bibas grants ROSS Intelligence motion to certify fair use & copyrighability of headnotes to Third Circuit for interlocutory appeal. Wow.Well, Judge Stephanos just made another stunning decision, adding to the series of stunning decisions he’s made in this case, including postponing the trial a day before it was to start. He granted ROSS Intelligence’s motion to certify the 2 questions he already decided on summary judgment, including the fair use defense for training ROSS’s…
-
Thomson Reuters opposes ROSS Intelligence’s attempt to interlocutory appeal
Read more: Thomson Reuters opposes ROSS Intelligence’s attempt to interlocutory appealThomson Reuters opposes ROSS Intelligence motion for leave to certify the issue of fair use to the Third Circuit following Judge Bibas’s 2025 grant of summary judgment rejecting fair use. Download the brief below:
-
Thomson Reuters, ROSS Intelligence fight over deposition designations
Read more: Thomson Reuters, ROSS Intelligence fight over deposition designationsROSS Intelligence asked for more time to submit its objections to Thomson Reuters’ deposition designations for the upcoming trial in May; ROSS will object to the expansion of Thomson Reuters’ depositions that it plans to designate. Thomson is fine with the extension but wants ROSS to narrow its objections.
-
ROSS Intelligence adds trial & appellate lawyers from White & Case to Thomson Reuters suit
Read more: ROSS Intelligence adds trial & appellate lawyers from White & Case to Thomson Reuters suitAfter losing on summary judgment in a decision by Judge Bibas, who rejected its fair use defense after once finding it plausible and in need of trial in 2023, ROSS Intelligence added more legal firepower, enlisting both trial and appellate lawyers from White & Case. The trial on the remaining issues (scope of infringement and…
-
Judge Bibas order re pretrial deadlines in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS Intelligence
Read more: Judge Bibas order re pretrial deadlines in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS IntelligenceHaving considered the joint letter regarding 2025 Pretrial Deadlines (D.I. 778 ), I ORDER the parties to follow the pretrial deadlines proposed by Thomson Reuters. I agree that my revised summary judgment opinion primarily narrowed the scope of the trial. But I recognize that Ross may have understandably shifted its trial strategy due to the…
-
Thomson Reuters v. ROSS Intelligence letter re: dispute over proposed pretrial deadlines
Read more: Thomson Reuters v. ROSS Intelligence letter re: dispute over proposed pretrial deadlinesWith some outstanding issues unresolved by Judge Bibas’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Thomson Reuters, the parties filed a letter outlining their proposed pretrial deadlines. ROSS proposes: Thomson proposes:
-
Judge Bibas sets pretrial conference for April 9 in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS Intelligence.
Read more: Judge Bibas sets pretrial conference for April 9 in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS Intelligence.ORAL ORDER: The April 9 pretrial conference will take place beginning at 9 a.m. EDT in Wilmington, Delaware. I order the parties to confer and propose a joint stipulation and order setting pretrial deadlines by March 6 at 5 p.m. EST. Remark: The Pretrial Conference that is scheduled for April 9, 2025 at 9:00 am…
-
Judge Bibas revises date for pre-trial check-in in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS Intelligence
Read more: Judge Bibas revises date for pre-trial check-in in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS IntelligenceFrom Judge Bibas: “ORAL ORDER: I previously asked the parties to hold May 8, 2025. D.I. 756 . I now release that date and reserve May 5, 2025, and May 6, 2025. Ordered by Judge Stephanos Bibas on 12/31/2024. (jfm) (Entered: 12/31/2024).”
-
ROSS Intelligence objects to Thomson Reuters’ annotated Excel sheet
Read more: ROSS Intelligence objects to Thomson Reuters’ annotated Excel sheetROSS Intelligence filed its redacted opposition to Thomson Reuters’ annotated Excel sheet regarding the headnotes at issue in the lawsuit.
