We are nearing the June 11 oral argument in the all-important appeal in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS Intelligence.
The parties submitted their formulation of the question presented:
SUMMARY OF ORAL ARGUMENT submitted by Attorney Mark S. Davies, Esq. for Appellant Ross Intelligence Inc. Case Summary:
Is a short quote or paraphrase of judicial holding copyrightable and does the fair use doctrine protect ROSS’s internal use of Westlaw’s headnotes in memos that served as training data for an AI legal search engine?
Ross Intelligence
SUMMARY OF ORAL ARGUMENT submitted by Attorney Miranda D. Means, Esq. for Appellees Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre GmbH and West Publishing Corp. Case Summary:
Whether a legal-research company that copied original editorial content from its competitor to build its own commercial product is not liable for copyright infringement because the copied content is not copyrightable or its copying was fair use.
Thomson Reuters
For the briefs, visit below:
