-

Anthropic says Bartz-class-opt out Shakespeare’s copyright claims are now barred by the 3-year statute of limitations. Must be dismissed.
Read more: Anthropic says Bartz-class-opt out Shakespeare’s copyright claims are now barred by the 3-year statute of limitations. Must be dismissed.Anthropic just filed its motion to dismiss the copyright claims of Bartz-class opt outs who filed the Shakespeare v. Anthropic suit. Anthropic asserts various grounds in its motion to dismiss. Among them, the 3-year statute of limitations under the Copyright Act now bars these claims, argues Anthropic. Excerpt: * * * DOWNLOAD BRIEF:
-
Cambronne book authors, Anthropic file case management statement
Read more: Cambronne book authors, Anthropic file case management statementAhead of the Sept. 3 initial case management hearing before Judge Pitts, the Cambronne book authors and Anthropic have filed a joint case management statement. The parties don’t agree on a schedule. Anthropic suggests the below. A trial wouldn’t be until 2028! DOWNLOAD:
-

Judge Pitts to preside over cluster of Anthropic book author suits in ND California
Read more: Judge Pitts to preside over cluster of Anthropic book author suits in ND CaliforniaJudge Pitts made it official: nearly all of the later filed book author and publisher suits against Anthropic are now related cases to Cambronne aka Carreyrou v. Anthropic. The related cases designation means Judge Pitts will get all these other cases too (original judge assignments noted): Judge Pitts’ order didn’t include the recently filed lawsuit…
-
Judge Tigar recuses himself from newly filed Shakespeare v. Anthropic
Read more: Judge Tigar recuses himself from newly filed Shakespeare v. AnthropicJudge Jon S. Tigar issued an order of recusal from the newly filed Shakespeare v. Anthropic. There’s a good chance this case will be considered a case related to the earliest filed book author suit, Carreyrou v. Anthropic before Judge Pitts, who could get all the book author / publisher suits against Anthropic other than Bartz…
-

Judge Pitts to sever John Carreyrou’s omnibus copyright lawsuit v. 8 AI companies. But unclear if Judge will keep case v. Anthropic.
Read more: Judge Pitts to sever John Carreyrou’s omnibus copyright lawsuit v. 8 AI companies. But unclear if Judge will keep case v. Anthropic.We will soon have greater clarity with what happens to John Carreyrou’s omnibus lawsuit against 8 AI companies (some of which have already been severed). Yesterday, Judge Pitts indicated that he will grant the motions to sever the lawsuit. But he had not decided which cases involving which defendant(s) he would keep. Interestingly, Carreyrou through…
-

US copyright cases v. AI hits 101. Cambronne v. Meta severed from Cambronne v. Anthropic.
Read more: US copyright cases v. AI hits 101. Cambronne v. Meta severed from Cambronne v. Anthropic.Author John Carreyrou’s lawsuit against the US AI industry started out small. But it may end up spawing 8 different lawsuits against 8 different U.S. AI companies. Already Cambronne v. OpenAI has been severed and sent to the MDL Litigation. And now Cambronne v. Meta has been severed, too. Both were severed by joint stipulation…
-
Judge Pitts scratches John Carreyrou plaintiffs’ and Meta’s idea of referring Cambronne v. Meta to Judge Chhabria for possible related case
Read more: Judge Pitts scratches John Carreyrou plaintiffs’ and Meta’s idea of referring Cambronne v. Meta to Judge Chhabria for possible related caseIt looks like Judge Pitts is keeping Cambronne v. Meta, now severed, at parties’ stipulation. The lawsuit originally was a part of the omnibus copyright lawsuit filed originally by author John Carrreyrou and other books authors who opted out of the Bartz v. Anthropic class settlement. The original lawsuit was basically against all the major…
