-
Judge Lee instructs Plaintiffs in AI copyright suit v. Google to define the proposed classes ahead of Feb. 20 class certification hearing
Read more: Judge Lee instructs Plaintiffs in AI copyright suit v. Google to define the proposed classes ahead of Feb. 20 class certification hearingJudge Lee wants the plaintiffs in In re Google Generative AI Litigation to provide the precise definition of the classes they are seeking certification of. Apparently, in their briefing, the plaintiffs have shifted the definition over the course of the litigation. The hearing is Feb. 20, 2026, 1 PM PDT in San Jose.
-
Plaintiffs seek to exclude William Patry’s expert testimony on issues relevant to class certification in Google AI suit
Read more: Plaintiffs seek to exclude William Patry’s expert testimony on issues relevant to class certification in Google AI suitPlaintiffs are seeking to exclude the expert testimony of two experts proffered by Google: William Patry and Ryan Sullivan. Of course, as Plaintiffs say, “Patry formerly served as Google’s Senior Copyright Counsel for over 17 years and now works at Quinn Emanuel, where he represents other large technology companies in litigation involving the use of…
-

John Carreyrou, book authors file copyright suit v. entire AI industry: Anthropic, Google, Meta, xAI (of Elon Musk), and Perplexity. Copyright suits hit 70. (Could have been 75.)
Read more: John Carreyrou, book authors file copyright suit v. entire AI industry: Anthropic, Google, Meta, xAI (of Elon Musk), and Perplexity. Copyright suits hit 70. (Could have been 75.)John Carreyrou and 5 other book authors (Lisa Barretta, Philip Shishkin, Jane Adams, Matthew Sacks, and Michael Kochin) ho opted out of the Bartz v. Anthropic with the encouragement of ClaimsHero, an Arizona-based law firm that has specialized in claims aggregation, have filed today a copyright lawsuit against nearly the entire U.S. AI industry: The…

