-
Cambronne book authors, Anthropic file case management statement
Read more: Cambronne book authors, Anthropic file case management statementAhead of the Sept. 3 initial case management hearing before Judge Pitts, the Cambronne book authors and Anthropic have filed a joint case management statement. The parties don’t agree on a schedule. Anthropic suggests the below. A trial wouldn’t be until 2028! DOWNLOAD:
-

Former Wall St. Journal writer Philip Shishkin drops copyright claim v. Anthropic
Read more: Former Wall St. Journal writer Philip Shishkin drops copyright claim v. AnthropicCuriously, book author and former Wall Street Journal Philip Shishkin has voluntarily dropped his copyright claim against Anthropic in the lawsuit with lead plaintiff Cambronne or John Carreyrou. Shishkin gave no reason for dropping for copyright claim against Anthropic. The other plaintiffs remain. DOWNLOAD:
-
Anthropic opposes
Read more: Anthropic opposesAnthropic opposes the motion of various plaintiffs in the Cambronne, Cognella, Chicken Soup for the Soul, Kwon, and Cruz lawsuits to consolidate the briefing for motions to dismiss in all the related cases. Anthropic argues that the respective complaints have their own deficiencies and lumping everything into 1 brief would not be effective or efficient.…
-

Judge Pitts relates Shakespeare v. Anthropic to Cambronne v. Anthropic. Judge to preside over all book author suits v. Anthropic, post-Bartz
Read more: Judge Pitts relates Shakespeare v. Anthropic to Cambronne v. Anthropic. Judge to preside over all book author suits v. Anthropic, post-BartzAs we predicted, Judge Pitts has deemed the Shakespeare v. Anthropic suit a related case to Cambronne v. Anthropic in the Northern District of California. The music cases (Concord Music I and II, and BMG) are before Judge Lee. The book cases before Judge Pitts are: Judge Pitts’ Order: Related Story:
-

Judge Pitts to sever John Carreyrou’s omnibus copyright lawsuit v. 8 AI companies. But unclear if Judge will keep case v. Anthropic.
Read more: Judge Pitts to sever John Carreyrou’s omnibus copyright lawsuit v. 8 AI companies. But unclear if Judge will keep case v. Anthropic.We will soon have greater clarity with what happens to John Carreyrou’s omnibus lawsuit against 8 AI companies (some of which have already been severed). Yesterday, Judge Pitts indicated that he will grant the motions to sever the lawsuit. But he had not decided which cases involving which defendant(s) he would keep. Interestingly, Carreyrou through…
-

US copyright cases v. AI hits 101. Cambronne v. Meta severed from Cambronne v. Anthropic.
Read more: US copyright cases v. AI hits 101. Cambronne v. Meta severed from Cambronne v. Anthropic.Author John Carreyrou’s lawsuit against the US AI industry started out small. But it may end up spawing 8 different lawsuits against 8 different U.S. AI companies. Already Cambronne v. OpenAI has been severed and sent to the MDL Litigation. And now Cambronne v. Meta has been severed, too. Both were severed by joint stipulation…
-
Judge Pitts scratches John Carreyrou plaintiffs’ and Meta’s idea of referring Cambronne v. Meta to Judge Chhabria for possible related case
Read more: Judge Pitts scratches John Carreyrou plaintiffs’ and Meta’s idea of referring Cambronne v. Meta to Judge Chhabria for possible related caseIt looks like Judge Pitts is keeping Cambronne v. Meta, now severed, at parties’ stipulation. The lawsuit originally was a part of the omnibus copyright lawsuit filed originally by author John Carrreyrou and other books authors who opted out of the Bartz v. Anthropic class settlement. The original lawsuit was basically against all the major…
