The parties in UMG Recordings v. Suno have asked Judge Saylor to amend the Amended Scheduling order by roughly 3 months due to ongoing discovery disputes, not to mention the pending motion for leave to amend the complaint.
Assuming the court grants the parties’ extension, that would likely push the Suno lawsuit furrther down in the list of cases that might have the next possible summary judgment ruling on fair use:
Here are the current schedules related to summary judgment motions:
- June 10, 2026 – Concord Music v. Anthropic hearing on SJ (Judge Lee) (see ECF No. 416)
- June 19, 2026 – UMG Recordings v. Suno SJ motions due (Judge Saylor IV) [Pending motion to extend the scheduling order may push this out at least 3 months]
- July 8, 2026 – In re Google Gen AI Litigation last day to file SJ motion (Judge Lee); last day to hear SJ motions Sept. 11, 2026, at 1:30 PM (see ECF No. 199)
- July 10, 2026 – In re Mosaic LLM Litigation replies on SJ due (Judge Breyer) (see ECF No. 172)
- Oct. 16, 2026 – In re ChatGPT Infringement Litigation replies on SJ due (Judge Stein) (see ECF No. 238)
- Nov. 4, 2026 – Andersen v. Stability AI hearing on SJ (Judge Orrick)
- Nov. 23, 2026 – Nazemian, Dubus v. NVIDIA replies due on SJ (Judge Tigar)
As shown above, Judge Lee is the next one in line to decide summary judgment in the Concord Music v. Anthropic case with the hearing set for June 10, 2026. And then, Judge Lee may have summary judgment motions filed by July 8, 2026 in the In re Google Gen AI Litigation. Neither lawsuit involves the Shadow Library Strategy, so they might present a more streamlined set of alleged facts for Judge Lee to consider.