- Anthropic opposes the “extraordinary” attorneys’ fees award sought for Non-Class Counsel.
- Anthropic suggests the lodestar method of computation would be better than the 20% sought by Class Counsel.
Interesting filing by Anthropic contesting the Plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees. The main dispute is that Anthropic argues that the “extraordinary” amount sought for Non-Class Counsel who helped in the litigation is not warranted.
Without taking a position on the precise fee award, Anthropic also suggests that the award sought by Class Counsel would be better computed using the lodestar method instead of the 20% of the class settlement amount sought.
DOWNLOAD ANTHROPIC’S RESPONSE
