Interestingly, ROSS Intelligence’s attorneys have filed a statement today, with record citations related to its argument during the summary judgment hearing. Yesterday, ROSS filed a letter partially on behalf of both sides to inform what Judge Bibas should compare in a side-by-side comparison: “The parties have agreed that this Court should do a side-by-side comparison of the memo questions, headnotes and judicial text using D.I. 678-21, an excerpt of Ms. Frederiksen-Cross’s three-way comparison, and 690-6 to 690-11, appendix B to Dr. Jonathan Krein’s Supplemental Expert Report.”
Today’s statement by ROSS is solely on its own behalf.