-
Dow Jones files First Amended Complaint v. Perplexity to correct allegation re: licensing reply from Perplexity
Dow Jones filed a First Amended Complaint against Perplexity. Apparently, the amended complaint was to fix an allegation that “Perplexity did not bother to respond” to Dow Jones’ July 2024 letter to Perplexity. The Amended Complaint now reads to incorporate Perplexity’s alleged response: Letter from Dow Jones: Email from Perplexity: Read more
-
Sarah Andersen v. Stability AI parties file Joint Case Management Statement as case assigned to Magistrate Judge Lisa Cisneros for discovery
Finally, the parties in Sarah Andersen v. Stability AI are headed for discovery. They filed their Joint Case Management Statement. Judge Orrick assigned the case to Magistrate Judge Lisa Cisneros for discovery. This was the first copyright lawsuit filed after the launch of OpenAI’s ChatGPT. It is noteworthy in that Judge Orrick allowed the plaintiffs Read more
-
Thomson Reuters calls ROSS Intelligence’s letter to Judge Bibas “inappropriate and wrong”
Thomson Reuters responded to a letter ROSS Intelligence submitted to Judge Bibas on Dec. 9 after the hearing on summary judgment the week before. Thomson Reuters blasts ROSS’s letter as “inappropriate” to submit and “wrong” on the law regarding whether expert testimony can be relied on in deciding summary judgment of copyright infringement. Will be Read more
-
ROSS Intelligence files statement with record citations noted during SJ hearing
Interestingly, ROSS Intelligence’s attorneys have filed a statement today, with record citations related to its argument during the summary judgment hearing. Yesterday, ROSS filed a letter partially on behalf of both sides to inform what Judge Bibas should compare in a side-by-side comparison: “The parties have agreed that this Court should do a side-by-side comparison Read more
-
Complaint in A.F. on behalf of J.F. v. Character Technologies, Inc. 2d tort lawsuit v. Character AI
Character Technologies is facing another tort lawsuit brought on behalf of a 9 year old girl and 17 year old in Texas. The girl allegedly was subject to “hypersexualized content” from Character AI, while the 17 year old was subject to violent content, including comments such as: “You know sometimes I’m not surprised when I Read more