-
Judge Bibas revises date for pre-trial check-in in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS Intelligence
Read more: Judge Bibas revises date for pre-trial check-in in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS IntelligenceFrom Judge Bibas: “ORAL ORDER: I previously asked the parties to hold May 8, 2025. D.I. 756 . I now release that date and reserve May 5, 2025, and May 6, 2025. Ordered by Judge Stephanos Bibas on 12/31/2024. (jfm) (Entered: 12/31/2024).”
-
ROSS Intelligence objects to Thomson Reuters’ annotated Excel sheet
Read more: ROSS Intelligence objects to Thomson Reuters’ annotated Excel sheetROSS Intelligence filed its redacted opposition to Thomson Reuters’ annotated Excel sheet regarding the headnotes at issue in the lawsuit.
-
Thomson Reuters disputes ROSS Intelligence Dec. 23 letter
Read more: Thomson Reuters disputes ROSS Intelligence Dec. 23 letterJudge Bibas asked the parties to submit the following information related to the year of publication of the Westlaw headnotes in question: “ORAL ORDER: Thank you to the parties for providing the native Excel file of D.I. 678 21 to the Court. Please update this file with the year of publication of each headnote in…
-
Judge Bibas sets pretrial conference for April 9, 2025 in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS Intelligence
Read more: Judge Bibas sets pretrial conference for April 9, 2025 in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS IntelligenceFrom Judge Bibas: I DIRECT the parties to reserve April 9, 2025, for a pretrial conference and May 8, 2025, for a subsequent pretrial check-in with the Court. Further details about the location and timing of both will be arranged when the dates get closer.. Ordered by Judge Stephanos Bibas on 12/20/2024.
-
Parties submit April 9, 2025 for pretrial conference in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS Intelligence
Read more: Parties submit April 9, 2025 for pretrial conference in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS IntelligenceIn a joint letter to Judge Bibas, “The Parties are available for the pretrial conference on April 9, 2025 and a pretrial check-in with the Court on May 8, 2025.”
-
Judge Bibas asks for year of headnote’s publication in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS Publication
Read more: Judge Bibas asks for year of headnote’s publication in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS PublicationJudge Bibas is considering motions for summary judgment. He just issued an oral order asking for the year of publication for each West headnote for the evidence submitted: ORAL ORDER: Thank you to the parties for providing the native Excel file of D.I. 678 21 to the Court. Please update this file with the year…
-
Parties file Joint Statement of Undisputed Facts in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS Intelligence
Read more: Parties file Joint Statement of Undisputed Facts in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS IntelligenceThe parties in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS Intelligence filed the public version of the Joint Statement of the Uncontested Facts that was contained in the Proposed Joint Pretrial Order filed back in July. The attachment is now available below. It’s unclear why this is being filed now.
-
Thomson Reuters calls ROSS Intelligence’s letter to Judge Bibas “inappropriate and wrong”
Read more: Thomson Reuters calls ROSS Intelligence’s letter to Judge Bibas “inappropriate and wrong”Thomson Reuters responded to a letter ROSS Intelligence submitted to Judge Bibas on Dec. 9 after the hearing on summary judgment the week before. Thomson Reuters blasts ROSS’s letter as “inappropriate” to submit and “wrong” on the law regarding whether expert testimony can be relied on in deciding summary judgment of copyright infringement. Will be…
-
ROSS Intelligence files statement with record citations noted during SJ hearing
Read more: ROSS Intelligence files statement with record citations noted during SJ hearingInterestingly, ROSS Intelligence’s attorneys have filed a statement today, with record citations related to its argument during the summary judgment hearing. Yesterday, ROSS filed a letter partially on behalf of both sides to inform what Judge Bibas should compare in a side-by-side comparison: “The parties have agreed that this Court should do a side-by-side comparison…
