-
Nazemian files Amended Complaint v. NVIDIA
Read more: Nazemian files Amended Complaint v. NVIDIAIt must be Amended Complaint Day. Nazemian just filed a proposed Amended Complaint against NVIDIA.The only catch is Nazemian himself has dropped out of the lawsuit. So it would become Keene v. NVIDIA. Judge Tigar will consider whether to grant Plaintiffs leave to amend to file this complaint. A hearing is set for Jan. 8,…
-
Judge Tigar reschedules Further Case Management conference for Mar. 20, 2026 in Nazemian v. NVIDIA
Read more: Judge Tigar reschedules Further Case Management conference for Mar. 20, 2026 in Nazemian v. NVIDIAJudge Tigar rescheduled the Further Case Management Conference in Nazemian v. NVIDIA: ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCEBecause the parties “agree that this case is proceeding apace and that a Case Management Conference is not necessary at this time,” ECF No. 221 at 2, the case management conference scheduled for December 5, 2025 is continued to…
-
Abdi Nazemian wants to drop out of the copyright suit he filed v. NVIDIA
Read more: Abdi Nazemian wants to drop out of the copyright suit he filed v. NVIDIAWell, it looks like filing a copyright lawsuit against an AI company is not all that it’s cracked up to be. Abdi Nazemian, the book author who is the lead plaintiff in Nazemian v. NVIDIA, is seeking to drop out of the lawsuit after only a year and a half. There are still other plaintiffs…
-
Parties in Nazemian v. NVIDIA propose updated schedule
Read more: Parties in Nazemian v. NVIDIA propose updated scheduleThe parties have filed a stipulation filling in dates to the amended scheduling order. The existing deadlines remain the same. The replies for summary judgment motions are due Dec. 4, 2026. And the replies for class certification are due Nov. 20, 2026. So there’s at least a small chance Judge Tigar could issue opinions on…
-
NVIDIA opposes Nazemian attempt to amend the complaint
Read more: NVIDIA opposes Nazemian attempt to amend the complaintNVIDIA opposes Nazemian plaintiffs’ attempt to amend the complaint to expand the allegations related to NVIDIA’s use of shadow libraries, as well as vicarious and contributory infringement claims. (Nazemian himself wants to voluntarily drop out of the case, leaving Dubus.) Excerpts from NVIDIA’s Brief Related Stories DOWNLOAD NVIDIA’S BRIEF
-
Nazemian seeks to amend complaint v. NVIDIA to add use of more shadow libraries & pirated books
Read more: Nazemian seeks to amend complaint v. NVIDIA to add use of more shadow libraries & pirated booksThe ripple effect from Judge Alsup’s ruling on summary judgment in Bartz v. Anthropic continues. Yet another plaintiff is copying what I call the Shadow Library Strategy and attempting to add a separate claim of copyright infringement based on the allegation that the defendant AI company downloaded and used additional shadow libraries containing pirated books.…
-
Briefing in 9th Circuit in Doe 1 v. Github
Read more: Briefing in 9th Circuit in Doe 1 v. GithubWe created a dedicated page for the briefing in the Doe 1 v. Github interlocutory appeal in the Ninth Circuit. Check it out here.
-
Judge Tigar rejects Nazemian’s attempt to get discovery of datasets beyond Complaint
Read more: Judge Tigar rejects Nazemian’s attempt to get discovery of datasets beyond ComplaintJudge Tigar upheld Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim’s ruling that denied Nazemian’s request to discover datasets from NVIDIA beyond the ones stated in the Complaint. Related Stories
-
NVIDIA files opposition to Nazemian’s attempt to reverse Magistrate Judge’s decision rejecting discovery of datasets outside of Complaint
Read more: NVIDIA files opposition to Nazemian’s attempt to reverse Magistrate Judge’s decision rejecting discovery of datasets outside of ComplaintNVIDIA just filed its opposition in response to Nazemian’s motion to reverse Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim’s denial of the plaintiffs’ motion to compel discovery of other datasets (from “shadow libraries”) not included in the Complaint.
-
Judge Tigar denies Joseph Saveri, others bid for interim co-lead counsel in suit v. NVIDIA
Read more: Judge Tigar denies Joseph Saveri, others bid for interim co-lead counsel in suit v. NVIDIAJudge Tigar ruled there was no demonstrated need to appoint interim co-lead class counsel in the consolidated cases Nazemian and Dubus versus NVIDIA.