-
Judge Breyer moves hearing on summary judgment, Daubert motions in Mosaic LLM case to Dec. 18 via Zoom
Read more: Judge Breyer moves hearing on summary judgment, Daubert motions in Mosaic LLM case to Dec. 18 via ZoomJudge Breyer just changed the hearing on the summary judgment and Daubert motions from Oct. 30, 2026 to Dec. 18, 2026 via Zoom. Here is the Order: Looks like he’s going to a Zoom hearing and moving the date to 12/18/2026: CLERK’S NOTICE VACATING MOTION Hearing set for October 30, 2026 before the Honorable Charles…
-
Plaintiffs in Mosaic case file notice on disputed Chakrabarty et al. “dilution” paper
Read more: Plaintiffs in Mosaic case file notice on disputed Chakrabarty et al. “dilution” paperFollowing a similar filing made on the same day in response to OpenAI’s motion to strike a paper on “dilution” and expert report based on it in the MDL Litigation, Plaintiffs’ counsel from the same law firm has filed a notice with Judge Breyer on the same disputed paper co-authored by Dr. Tuhin Chakrabarty et…
-
Judge Labson Freeman dismisses without prejudice Beaulier’s CMI claims v. Roblox
Read more: Judge Labson Freeman dismisses without prejudice Beaulier’s CMI claims v. RobloxAustin Beaulier has now had a second case dismissed for failure to state a claim. In Beaulier v. Roblox, Judge Labson Freeman held that Beaulier DMCA CMI claims failed to adequately allege intentional removal of CMI to state a 1202(b)(1) claim and failed to adequately allege 3 elements of the 1202(b)(3) claims: “(2) that the…
-
Adobe seeks to relate recently filed securities derivative suits with prior filed copyright class actions before Judge Scott Corley
Read more: Adobe seeks to relate recently filed securities derivative suits with prior filed copyright class actions before Judge Scott CorleyAdobe is requesting that Judge Scott Corley consider the recently filed copyright securities derivative suits — Hirschberger v. Narayen and SEIU Pension Plan Master Trust v. Adobe — as related cases to Lyon and Kleiner v. Adobe. The Tanzer v. Adobe suit was just dismissed by the Judge due to insufficient allegations of injury (or…
-
Google suffers another legal setback as Judge Breyer grants David Greene’s “voice likeness” case back to state court. Not preempted by Copyright Act.
Read more: Google suffers another legal setback as Judge Breyer grants David Greene’s “voice likeness” case back to state court. Not preempted by Copyright Act.Google suffered another legal setback. First, its case against SerpApi was dismissed. And now David Greene’s lawsuit against Google was just remanded back to state court. Judge Breyer held the claims were based on “voice likeness” outputs, and not inputs used to train Google’s AI models. Therefore, they were not preempted by the Copyright Act.…
-
Parties in Mosaic LLM case file summary judgment motions on infringement and fair use
Read more: Parties in Mosaic LLM case file summary judgment motions on infringement and fair useWe created a new page of the summary judgment briefs in In re Mosaic LLM Litigation before Judge Charles Breyer. Other than the case on appeal (ROSS Intelligence), only 4 cases of the AI copyright lawsuits have entered the summary judgment stage: Kadrey, Bartz, Concord Music I, and now In re Mosaic LLM. As shown…
-
Molly Tanzer sues Adobe for copyright infringement in AI. Her 2d suit. Both filed by Joseph Saveri Law Firm.
Read more: Molly Tanzer sues Adobe for copyright infringement in AI. Her 2d suit. Both filed by Joseph Saveri Law Firm.Molly Tanzer, a book author, has filed another copyright lawsuit in a proposed class action. This one is against Adobe for its alleged use of the SlimPajama dataset, a subset compiled from Books3 dataset by Cerebras for AI research, to train Adobe’s model(s). In James v. Cerebras, Cerebras contends that its purpose for sharing the…
-
Google opposes David Greene’s motion to remand case to state court
Read more: Google opposes David Greene’s motion to remand case to state courtGoogle opposes Dadid L. Greene’s motion to remand the case back to state court. Green alleges Google misappropriated and used recordings of his voice to train its Notebook LM model. Google argues Greene’s state law claims are equivalent to a copyright claim and preempted by the Copyright Act. DOWNLOAD GOOGLE’S OPPOSITION
-
David L. Greene opposes Google’s motion to dismiss complaint with state law claims related to alleged use of his voice
Read more: David L. Greene opposes Google’s motion to dismiss complaint with state law claims related to alleged use of his voiceFormer NPR host of “All Things Considered,” David L. Greene has filed his opposition to Google’s motion to dismiss his state law claims for alleged appropriation of his voice. Google argues his claims are preempted by the Copyright Act. Greene argues they are not. The suit is before Judge Breyer. Excerpt: DOWNLOAD GREENE’S OPPOSITION