, , ,

Angie Cruz v. Anthropic filed on eve of final approval hearing in Bartz v. Anthropic. Angie Cruz, Dave Eggers, Andrew Sean Greer, Tobias Wolff, and others opting out of Bartz settlement seek trial on statutory damages, plus permanent injunction v. Claude.

On the eve of the fairness hearing for final approval of the $1.5 billion settlement in Bartz v. Anthopric before Judge Martinez-Olguin, a second group of book authors who opted out of the Bartz class settlement just sued Anthropic.

(The first group led by John Carreyrou aka Cambronne Inc. is represented by the same law firms, Stris & Maher and Freedman Normand Friedland LLP.)

Trial on Statutory Damages Sought

These 28 book author plaintiffs led by Angie Cruz, author of Domicana and other books, said they are not filing a class action. They want a trial on statutory damages:

Permanent Injunction v. Anthropic Sought

The plaintiffs also seek a permanent injunction against Anthropic, which likely includes Claude models trained on the plaintiffs’ works:

Plaintiffs will likely seek injunctive relief to stop “dilution” of their works by shutting down Claude’s ability to generate non-infringing outputs in the same genre of literary works as the plaintiffs’ works.

Citing the U.S. Copyright Office’s new theory of dilution from its pre-publication report, the plaintiffs’ Complaint alleges that Claude harms their copyrights by creating non-infringing content aka “indirect substitutes” that “pose a serious risk of diluting markets for works of the same kind as in their training data.”

In the report that plaintiffs cite, the Copyright Office relied on the arguments from copyright holders that copyright should protect against harms based on the use of genres and styles [e]ven when the output is not substantially similar to a specific underlying work,” meaning the output is non-infringing.

So-called copyright dilution is a new, controversial theory that will be tested in this lawsuit and others. Judge Alsup rejected it in Bartz v. Anthropic. Judge Chhabria endorsed it but only in dicta in Kadrey v. Meta because the plaintiffs had failed to present evidence of it beyond speculation.

The plaintiffs in Cruz explain “dilution theory” aka “indirect substitution” below:

The 28 plaintiffs listed in the complaint are:

  1. Angie Cruz
  2. Sean Arbabi
  3. Ascalon, LLC
  4. Martin Atkins
  5. Michael Ault
  6. Jacob Bernstein
  7. Matt Birkbeck
  8. Charles Blackstone
  9. Warren Bobrow
  10. Jim Campbell
  11. Dennis Carstens
  12. Kerry Chance
  13. Sinan Ciddi
  14. Brian Copeland
  15. Aya de Leon
  16. Carolina De Robertis
  17. Jaquira Diaz
  18. Dave Eggers
  19. John Ferejohn
  20. Walter Gmelch
  21. Nicole Gonzalez Van Cleve
  22. Michael Goodrich
  23. Ron Hall
  24. Marla Heller
  25. Daniel James
  26. Lynn Sonberg
  27. Lynn Sonberg Book Associates
  28. Vendela Vida

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLAINT IN CRUZ V. ANTHROPIC

Leave a Reply


Discover more from Chat GPT Is Eating the World

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading