, ,

In Anders v. Stability AI, Chief Judge Reidinger denies Anders’ motion to alter judgment denying his claims but does not award attorneys’ fees to Stability

The Anders v. Stability AI lawsuit is coming to a close in the district court.

Chief Judge Reidinger rejected the plaintiff Jerry Anders’ motion to alter the judgment as merely rearguing the same issues and disagreeing with the court’s interpretation of the license at issue in this case. The court held that the license Anders agreed to with defendant Navarr permitted it to license his work for all types of purposes, including use in training AI models.

But the Chief Judge also rejected Stability AI’s motion for attorney’s fees: “Upon review
of the filings in this matter, Court concludes that the Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, attempted to prosecute his case in a relatively diligent and timely fashion, without malice or bad faith.”

DOWNLOAD THE COURT’S REJECTION OF MOTION TO ALTER

DOWNLOAD THE COURT’S REJECTION OF ATTORNEY FEES AWARD

Leave a Reply


Discover more from Chat GPT Is Eating the World

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading