On New Year’s Eve, Judge Breyer granted the Plaintiffs’ motion to amend the scheduling order in the In re Mosaic LLM Litigation.
Summary judgment replies get pushed back a month and a half, with a new deadline of August 24, 2026.
Court’s Order:
This extension pushes back In re Mosaic LLM Litigation a little bit in terms of the cases that will have the next chance for a summary judgment ruling on fair use versus infringement.
Below are the current schedules related to summary judgment motions. Judge Eumi Lee presides over 2 lawsuits with the next chance for a summary judgment ruling, with the Concord Music v. Anthropic case in pole position. The irony that Anthropic (which settled the Bartz suit) can have the 2 quickest resolutions in the district court.
- June 10, 2026 – Concord Music v. Anthropic hearing on SJ (Judge Lee) (see ECF No. 416)
- July 8, 2026 – In re Google Gen AI Litigation last day to file SJ motion (Judge Lee); last day to hear SJ motions Sept. 11, 2026, at 1:30 PM (see ECF No. 199)
- Aug. 14, 2026 – UMG Recordings v. Suno SJ motions due (Judge Saylor IV)
- Aug. 24, 2026 – In re Mosaic LLM Litigation replies on SJ due (Judge Breyer)
- Oct. 16, 2026 – In re ChatGPT Infringement Litigation replies on SJ due (Judge Stein) (see ECF No. 238)
- Nov. 4, 2026 – Andersen v. Stability AI hearing on SJ (Judge Orrick)
- Nov. 23, 2026 – Nazemian, Dubus v. NVIDIA replies due on SJ (Judge Tigar)