, , ,

Magistrate Judge van Keulen denies Plaintiffs’ motion to “produce evidence sufficient to identify” Plaintiffs’ copyrighted works beyond the datasets already produced

In In re Google Generative AI Litigation, Magistrate Judge van Keulen denied the Plaintiffs’ motion to compel Google to “produce evidence sufficient to identify, or simply identify: (1) all Named Plaintiffs’ copyrighted works in the datasets … used by Google to train the Models, and (2) all class member copyrighted works used for that purpose.”

The only way to identify such works is to examine the training datasets Google used and already produced.

DOWNLOAD THE ORDER

Leave a Reply


Discover more from Chat GPT Is Eating the World

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading