Chat GPT Is Eating the World

Category: datasets

Courts set Aug. 20 hearing for Darius James’ motion for leave to file First Amended Complaint

In James v. Cerebras Systems, The Clerk has scheduled a hearing on August 20, 2026, at 2:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 10, 19th Floor before Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin. James has asked the court leave to file a First Amended Complaint that adds a claim for contributory infringement related to Cerebras Systems’ alleged creation and…
Read more: Courts set Aug. 20 hearing for Darius James’ motion for leave to file First Amended Complaint
Sam Altman, Dario Amodei refuse to hold hands at AI summit in India

Here’s the video of Sam Altman and Dario Amodei refusing to hold hands in a display of unity at the AI Summit in India. Something or nothing?
Read more: Sam Altman, Dario Amodei refuse to hold hands at AI summit in India
Magistrate Judge van Keulen denies Plaintiffs’ motion to “produce evidence sufficient to identify” Plaintiffs’ copyrighted works beyond the datasets already produced

In In re Google Generative AI Litigation, Magistrate Judge van Keulen denied the Plaintiffs’ motion to compel Google to “produce evidence sufficient to identify, or simply identify: (1) all Named Plaintiffs’ copyrighted works in the datasets … used by Google to train the Models, and (2) all class member copyrighted works used for that purpose.”…
Read more: Magistrate Judge van Keulen denies Plaintiffs’ motion to “produce evidence sufficient to identify” Plaintiffs’ copyrighted works beyond the datasets already produced
Parties in Google Generative AI Litigation dispute over how to identify whether Plaintiffs’ works are in the training datasets used by Google

Before Thanksgiving, the parties in In re Google Generative AI Litigation filed a letter outlining the parties’ dispute over how to examine whether the plaintiffs’ works are in the datasets used to train Google’s models — and who should undertake the labor in doing so. Plaintiffs want Google to identify whether the works are in…
Read more: Parties in Google Generative AI Litigation dispute over how to identify whether Plaintiffs’ works are in the training datasets used by Google
Parties in Google case dispute over datasets used by Google to train

The parties in the In re Google Gen AI Litigation are disputing over whether plaintiffs can discover certain datasets at Google. According to Google, there are 7: FineWeb, FineWeb2, FineWeb-edu, Common Crawl, The Pile, RedPajama, and RedPajama2. But Google said it didn’t use these datasets to train the relevant models in the lawsuit. By contrast,…
Read more: Parties in Google case dispute over datasets used by Google to train
Databricks opposes discovery of new model DBRX as beyond scope of book authors’ complaint v. Mosaic LLM

There’s a discovery battle brewing in the In re Mosaic LLM Litigation. Databricks opposes the discovery requests for evidence related to Databricks’ new model DBRX, which goes beyond the complaint against the model Mosaic LLM (that Databricks acquired the rights to). Apparently, the plaintiffs are seeking information related to the datasets used to train the…
Read more: Databricks opposes discovery of new model DBRX as beyond scope of book authors’ complaint v. Mosaic LLM
OpenAI ordered to turn over “English Colang Dataset” to book authors in Tremblay case

In the Tremblay v. OpenAI case, Magistrate Judge Illman granted the book authors’ request to compel OpenAI to turn over one of the datasets that it used: “English Colang Dataset.” It apparently was difficult to navigate under the data-inspection rules set for discovery by agreement of the parties, as reported by Aruni Soni of Bloomberg…
Read more: OpenAI ordered to turn over “English Colang Dataset” to book authors in Tremblay case