-
Millette files First Am. Complaint v. Google, NVIDIA adding copyright claim. AI cases hit 38 in U.S.
Read more: Millette files First Am. Complaint v. Google, NVIDIA adding copyright claim. AI cases hit 38 in U.S.David Millette filed 3 separate lawsuits basically for alleged scraping of YouTube videos to train the AI models of 3 different companies: OpenAI, Google, and NVIDIA. At first, the lawsuits were based on state law claims only — presumably because the plaintiff did not have registrations for the copyrights to his videos at the time.…
-
Photobucket sued to stop use of user photos in deals w/ AI and biometric companies. Asserts 11 claims including DMCA 1202(b)(1), (3).
Read more: Photobucket sued to stop use of user photos in deals w/ AI and biometric companies. Asserts 11 claims including DMCA 1202(b)(1), (3).An interesting new lawsuit filed in the District of Colorado. Mac Pierce and other users of Photobucket. The Complaint alleges: “Photobucket is threatening to sell Plaintiffs’ images to third parties who can use them to create biometric facial recognition databases that intrude on Plaintiffs’ privacy by identifying them wherever they go. Additionally, Photobucket hopes to…
-
Status of all 35 copyright lawsuits v. AI (Nov. 24, 2024): Concord Music v. Anthropic injunction hearing on Nov. 25; Thomson Reuters SJ hearing on Dec. 5. Standing becomes an issue. Cases march on.
Read more: Status of all 35 copyright lawsuits v. AI (Nov. 24, 2024): Concord Music v. Anthropic injunction hearing on Nov. 25; Thomson Reuters SJ hearing on Dec. 5. Standing becomes an issue. Cases march on.Here’s the latest on all 35 copyright lawsuits against AI companies. Lots going on. Significant rulings Other developments Upcoming Hearings New developments since last week’s report are indicated with an asterisk*. Visit our Master List of all 35 copyright cases with attorneys and claims listed. Case name Jurisdiction Judge Latest status Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre GmbH et…
-
NVIDIA asserts Millette lacks standing due to failure to alleged “a concrete, particularized injury in fact” under Constitution, simply based on scraping YouTube videos to train AI
Read more: NVIDIA asserts Millette lacks standing due to failure to alleged “a concrete, particularized injury in fact” under Constitution, simply based on scraping YouTube videos to train AINVIDIA filed its motion to dismiss David Millette’s complaint alleging state law claims for NVIDIA’s alleged use of his videos to train NVIDIA’s AI model. NVIDIA leads off with the argument that Millette’s bare allegations do not satisfy the U.S. Constitution’s Article III requirement of a concrete, particularized injury to establish a plaintiff’s standing in…