-

Why copyright dilution, endorsed by the Copyright Office’s Report, is not only “uncharted,” it’s unconstitutional.
Read more: Why copyright dilution, endorsed by the Copyright Office’s Report, is not only “uncharted,” it’s unconstitutional.The second version of my pre-prepint article “Fair Use and the Origin of AI Training” is now available on SSRN. Download here. It will be published by the Houston Law Review later this year. The revised version adds a new section to explain why courts should reject the Copyright Office’s pre-publication report’s endorsement of a…
-

My paper on “Fair Use and the Origin of AI Training.” Or why the Copyright Office Report is wrong about fair use and why courts should reject its view.
Read more: My paper on “Fair Use and the Origin of AI Training.” Or why the Copyright Office Report is wrong about fair use and why courts should reject its view.I am happy to share my latest law review article, “Fair Use and the Origin of AI Training,” forthcoming in Houston Law Review in the fall. Download a preprint copy of my paper at SSRN by following this link. Main points in my article, “fair use and the origin of ai training” The origin of…
-
Opinion: Why the Copyright Office’s “pre-publication” Report is flawed–both procedurally and substantively.
Read more: Opinion: Why the Copyright Office’s “pre-publication” Report is flawed–both procedurally and substantively.The dust is still settling in the aftermath of the Copyright Office’s issuance of a “pre-publication” version of its long-awaited Report analyzing the issue of fair use in AI training. A cloud now hangs over the Report–and whether it’s DOA–following President Trump’s firing of the Register of Copyrights Shira Perlmutter less than 24 hours after…

