-

Judge Alsup blasts ClaimsHero attempt to “trick” class authors to opt out in “a fraud of immense proportions.” Warns of case referral to the U.S. Attorney’s office.
Read more: Judge Alsup blasts ClaimsHero attempt to “trick” class authors to opt out in “a fraud of immense proportions.” Warns of case referral to the U.S. Attorney’s office.Things went horribly for Devin “Velvel” Freedman, counsel for ClaimsHero at today’s hearing. As we predicted before the hearing, things woulldn’t–and didn’t–end well for ClaimsHero. From the start of ClaimsHero’s argument, Judge Alsup excoriated Freedman, a lawyer from Freedman Normand Friedland LLP, for ClaimsHero’s “misleading” interference with the claims and opt out process approved by…
-

Bartz Class Counsel asks for leave to file reply to ClaimsHero. Proposed reply blasts ClaimsHero’s brief.
Read more: Bartz Class Counsel asks for leave to file reply to ClaimsHero. Proposed reply blasts ClaimsHero’s brief.Things are getting heated in the Bartz v. Anthropic case. Less than 24 hours after third-party law firm ClaimsHero filed a full-throated First Amendment defense of its marketing, social media, and website overtures to Bartz class members to opt out, the Bartz Class Counsel filed motion for leave to file a reply. Bartz Class Counsel…
-

ClaimsHero offers vigorous defense of its overtures to Bartz class members. Disputes Bartz Class Counsel’s allegations.
Read more: ClaimsHero offers vigorous defense of its overtures to Bartz class members. Disputes Bartz Class Counsel’s allegations.ClaimsHero, an Arizona law firm that specializes in aggregating claims for class actions, gave a full-throated defense of its overtures to Bartz class members who potentially choose to opt out of the class recovery and pursue their own claims against Anthropic separately. When the Bartz Class Counsel had contacted ClaimsHero about Class Counsel’s concerns with…
-

Anthropic agrees with Bartz’s motion to limit ClaimsHero’s overtures to class members. Anthropic also suggests ClaimsHero is using Anthropic’s trademarks in way likely to cause confusion.
Read more: Anthropic agrees with Bartz’s motion to limit ClaimsHero’s overtures to class members. Anthropic also suggests ClaimsHero is using Anthropic’s trademarks in way likely to cause confusion.As invited by Judge Alsup, Anthropic has officially weighed in on the controversy brewing over a third-party firm named ClaimsHero’s overtures to Bartz class members. For more about this controversy, visit here: Anthropic agrees with Bartz book authors that the court should issue an order limiting ClaimsHero’s overtures to class members (apparently seeking to represent…
-
Judge Alsup denies and criticizes Bartz book authors’ Counsel for changes to class notice. Also denies Theodore Cheng as special master, finding his $1K per hour rate too high.
Read more: Judge Alsup denies and criticizes Bartz book authors’ Counsel for changes to class notice. Also denies Theodore Cheng as special master, finding his $1K per hour rate too high.The Bartz v. Anthropic copyright lawsuit has faced more twists and turns than Odysseus. After Judge Alsup preliminarily approved the historic $1.5 billion class settlement (only after declining to approve it due to concerns the Judge raised at the first hearing), the claims process seemed to be moving along swimmingly. Bartz Class Counsel’s “Status Report”…
-

Judge Alsup quickly grants expedited hearing for Nov. 13, 8 AM, subject to service on ClaimsHero.
Read more: Judge Alsup quickly grants expedited hearing for Nov. 13, 8 AM, subject to service on ClaimsHero.Judge Alsup wasted no time in granting the Class Counsel for the Bartz book authors’ motion for an expedited hearing. Judge Alsup set the in-person hearing for Nov. 13, 8 AM, in San Francisco. The order is subject to Class Counsel serving the relevant papers on ClaimsHero. The attorneys for ClaimsHero better be prepared. Expect…
-

Bartz book authors face new foe: ClaimsHero firm seeking to represent book authors who opt out. Bartz asks Judge Alsup for expedited hearing on Nov. 12, 2025.
Read more: Bartz book authors face new foe: ClaimsHero firm seeking to represent book authors who opt out. Bartz asks Judge Alsup for expedited hearing on Nov. 12, 2025.The Bartz book authors, who were successful in securing a $1.5 billion settlement in their copyright suit against Anthropic, now face a new foe: an Arizona based firm called ClaimsHero, which touts itself as “a platform and law firm dedicated to helping individuals seamlessly collect what’s theirs.“ On its website, ClaimsHero tracks class actions, especially…
-
Bartz status report: received claims for 58,788 out of 482,460 works (12.2%). Asks for Theo Cheng to be special master instead of Naomi Jane Gray.
Read more: Bartz status report: received claims for 58,788 out of 482,460 works (12.2%). Asks for Theo Cheng to be special master instead of Naomi Jane Gray.The Bartz Class Counsel filed a status report late Friday. Two items to note: (1) So far, 58,788 out of 482,460 works (12.2%) have been subject to claims for the payout. UPDATE: I have done further research with comparison to participation rates in other cases. 12% participation rate is a decent, respectable start, already within…
-
Judge Alsup sets Fairness Hearing for Bartz settlement on April 23, 2026
Read more: Judge Alsup sets Fairness Hearing for Bartz settlement on April 23, 2026Judge Alsup set the Fairness Hearing for April 23, 2026, noon, to consider the final approval of the class action settlement. It’s possible there will be a different judge presiding over the Fairness Hearing. Judge Alsup said he intended to go inactive by the end of the year, although he was not definitive.
-
Bartz v. Anthropic notice of compliance with Judge Alsup’s directives. Ask to change final approval hearing date to April 23, 2026
Read more: Bartz v. Anthropic notice of compliance with Judge Alsup’s directives. Ask to change final approval hearing date to April 23, 2026The parties in the Bartz v. Anthropic case filed their notice of compliance with the instructions Judge Alsup gave at the hearing for preliminary approval of the class settlement. They also asked to change the date of the hearing for final approval to one more day from the original date, so on April 23, 2026.…