Citing Supreme Court’s decision in Cox, Midjourney asks for judgment on the pleadings that Disney’s contributory infringement claim fails as a matter of law

The fallout from the Supreme Court’s decision in Cox Communications v. Sony Music Entertainment continues.

Following OpenAI’s successful strategy, Midjourney has asked the court for judgment on the pleadings and a ruling that Disney’s claim of contributory infringement fails as a matter of law.

Judge Kronstadt presides.

Excerpt:

DOWNLOAD MIDJOURNEY’S MOTION:

Midjourney mtn for Judgment on Pleadings of Contributory Infringement Download

Related Story:

Cox Communications decision continues to wipe out contributory infringement claims in lawsuits v. AI companies

Concord Music v. Anthropic I Second Amended Complaint after secondary liability claims dismissed with prejudice

Daily News plaintiffs follow New York Times’ strategy in seeking to drop contributory infringement claims v. OpenAI and trademark dilution claims as well

New York Times abandons contributory infringement claim v. OpenAI in light of Supreme Court’s Cox decision

Cox Communications decision looms large over AI lawsuits as parties file supplemental briefs and letters on Supreme Court’s decision

Meta, NVIDIA already cite Supreme Court’s decision in Cox Communications. Judge Tigar orders supplemntal briefing in Nazemenian lawsuit.

Supreme Court requires intent for contributory copyright infringement in a decision likely helpful to AI companies

Substack

Chat GPT Is Eating the World

Citing Supreme Court’s decision in Cox, Midjourney asks for judgment on the pleadings that Disney’s contributory infringement claim fails as a matter of law

Like this:

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

Citing Supreme Court’s decision in Cox, Midjourney asks for judgment on the pleadings that Disney’s contributory infringement claim fails as a matter of law

Share this:

Like this:

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

Discover more from Chat GPT Is Eating the World