In UMG Recordings v. Suno, “Suno requests impoundment of two discrete references to the number of audio files Plaintiffs allege Suno used to train its generative AI model (the ‘Model Training Figure’). As Suno explained in support of its earlier request for impoundment of this same information, the Model Training Figure is intentionally nonpublic and commercially sensitive, and its disclosure ‘would risk significant competitive harm to Suno.’”
Here’s the order that raised this issue: “District Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. Plaintiffs have filed an unopposed motion to impound certain papers supporting their motion for leave to file an amended complaint. (Dkt. No. 230 ). By doing so, defendant has the opportunity to file within five business days a statement of the reasons that the material should be impounded in accordance with the protective order in this case and Local Rule 7.2. (Dkt. No. 180 22).
“A member of the press has submitted a letter opposing the motion to impound. (Dkt. No. 233 ). Consistent with the protective order, defendant shall, on or before May 29, 2026, file with the Court a statement of the reasons the material should be impounded that complies with Local Rule 7.2 and addresses the issues raised in the letter.”
DOWNLOAD SUNO’S BRIEF