Adobe directors and officers were sued again by shareholders. Hirschberger v. Narayen, filed in the Northern District of California, is similar to SEIU Pension Plan v. Narayen before Judge Orrick.
The theory is that Adobe misrepresented that it was training its AI models on licensed content and instead relied on unlicensed materials in the SlimPajama dataset, the basis for several copyright lawsuits against various defendants.
Excerpt:
DOWNLOAD COMPLAINT IN HIRSCHBERGER V. NARAYEN
Related Story