,

In complex decision, Judge Brimmer administratively closes lawsuit v. Photobucket for future AI training based on images

In the District of Colorado case Pierce v. Photobucket, Judge Brimmer issued an important ruling last.

It’s a fairly complex decision with different rulings as to each plaintiff. The end result is that the Judge has administratively closed the case subject to reopening by any party upon a showing of good cause.

If I understand the opinion correctly, the Judge ruled:

  1. Mac Pierce “did not enter into an agreement with Photobucket to arbitrate his claims” (23).
  2. Niki Hughes “agreed to arbitrate her claims against Photobucket” (26).
  3. Sean Hughes‘ “claims are not subject to arbitration.”
  4. Valerie Cumming “did not agree to arbitrate her claims with Photobucket.”
  5. But “Given the significant overlap between the arbitrable claims and nonarbitrable claims and potential for a preclusive effect, the Court finds that a stay of this proceeding pending arbitration is warranted. See Adams v. Modernad Media, LLC, No. 12-cv- 00513-PAB-MEH, 2013 WL 6740.”

That means Pierce and Niki Hughes head to arbitration. And Sean Hughes and Cumming’s lawsuit is stayed pending the arbitration.

DOWNLOAD THE DECISION

Leave a Reply


Discover more from Chat GPT Is Eating the World

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading