- Judge Lee granted in part Google’s motion to dismiss the first amended complaint of the visual artists in In re Google Generative AI Litigation.
- However, the infringement claims related to the models PaLM, GLaM, LaMDA, Bard, Gemini, and Imagen remain.
- So, the plaintiffs are probably happy with this result.
Judge Eumi Lee granted in part Google’s motion to dismiss the first amended complaint of the visual artists or content creators in In re Google Generative AI Litigation.
Judge Lee allowed the infringement claims related to Google’s models: The Court concludes that Plaintiffs plausibly allege copyright infringement as to the models: PaLM, GLaM, LaMDA, Bard, Gemini, and Imagen.
But Judge Lee dismissed with prejudice claims related to these models: Codey, Chirp, Veo, MedLM, LearnLM, SecLM, Gemma, CodeGemma, RecurrentGemma, and PaliGemma.
Judge Lee also dismissed the vicarious liability claim against parent Alphabet due to lack of allegations it had the right and ability to supervise the infringing conduct of Google.
