, , ,

Anthropic faces potential business-ending liability in statutory damages after Judge Alsup certifies class action by Bartz

In practical terms, what class certification means is that Anthropic faces at least the potential for business-ending liability.

It all depends on the number of works within the class (yet to be determined by the plaintiffs in compiling its list, as Judge Alsup instructed). But it also depends on the figure the jury picks within the statutory range: the standard range is $750 – $30,000 per work infringed. For willful infringement, the maximum goes up to $150,000 per work.

Let’s see how this would play out.

The first table below shows possible scenarios under the standard range, $750 – $30,000 per work. Even under the standard range, it’s a theoretical possibility that the highest award matches or surpasses Anthropic’s reported valuation. These scenarios are unlikely because they would require a very large number of works within the class (4 million – 6 million), although Judge Alsup does cite, on p. 3 of the order, a “5 million unique works” figure that one of the parties used in a brief as a possible example of the total amount of works. Given duplicate copies of the same works in the datasets, plus the several limitations defining the class (see above), such a large number seems less likely. But we can’t know for sure until the plaintiffs undertake the steps in the order to compile the list due Sept. 1.

possible statutory damages under for standard infringement

But, even if there are only 100,000 works in the class, the total damages can easily hit $1 billion to $3 billion under the standard range, as shown in bold in the second row in the table below. To put these billion dollar figures into perspective, the largest copyright statutory damages award that I am aware (that wasn’t reduced) was $1 billion in Cox Communication (10,017 works x $99,830.29/work). But that amount was thrown out on other grounds, and the contributory infringement claim might ultimately fail if the Supreme Court reviews the case as the Solicitor General recommends. And, here, the total number of works can far surpass 10,000, the amount in Cox Communications.

Works Infringed$750/work$1,000/
work
$10,000/
work
$20,000/
work
$30,000/
work
10,000$7.5M$10M$100M$200M$300M
100,000$75M$100M$1B$2B$3B
250,000$187.5M$250M$2.5B$5B$7.5B
500,000$375M$500M$5B$10B$15B
750,000$562.5M$750M$7.5B$15B$22.5B
1,000,000$750M$1B$10B$20B$30B
1,500,000$1.125B$1.5B$15B$30B$45B
2,000,000$1.5B$2B$20B$40B$60B
3,000,000$2.25B$3B$30B$60B$90B
4,000,000$3B$4B$40B$80B$120B
5,000,000$3.75B$5B$50B$100B$150B
6,000,000$4.5B$6B$60B$120B$180B

Plus, given Judge Alsup’s order and prior opinion on fair use (rejecting it for the downloading of pirated copies), willful infringement by Anthropic is at least in play. In the 9th Circuit, the standard for willful infringement is:

“willful” means acting with knowledge that one’s conduct constitutes copyrightinfringement. 17 U.S.C. § 504(c)(2); Dolman v. Agee, 157 F.3d 708, 715 (9th Cir.1998). A person who believes reasonably and in good faith that conduct does not constitute infringement does not act willfully. Peer Int’l. Corp. v. Pausa Records, Inc., 909 F.2d 1332, 1336 (9th Cir.1990).

Societe Civile Succession Guino v. Renoir, 305 F. App’x 334, 339 (9th Cir. 2008), as amended on denial of reh’g (Apr. 1, 2009)

Things escalate quickly once we are considering a defendant who committed willful infringement. The jury can pick any figure within the range, now from $750 to $150,000 per work infringed.

The highest amount doesn’t hit a trillion dollars but it comes close, as shown in the table below. All but two scenarios will involve billion dollars or more. Of course, it’s probably an unrealistic assumption to think that the total class will involve 1 million or more works that meet all the criteria, but we can’t rule it out right now. As you can see in this second table, nearly every award is in bold, indicating a billion dollars or more. And, given how dimly Judge Alsup has viewed Anthropic “Napster-like” conduct–which he repeatedly called “stealing,” Anthropic probably can’t expect Judge Alsup to reduce an enormous award under remittitur. So, whatever the jury in San Francisco comes up with is likely to stand, assuming the case doesn’t settle.

And settlement has to be at least a consideration for Anthropic now.

possible statutory damages for willful infringement
Works infringed$50K/work$75K/work$100K/work$125K/work$150K/work
10,000$500M$750M$1B$1.25B$1.5B
100,000$5B$7.5B$10B$12.5B$15B
250,000$12.5B$18.75B$25B$31.25B$37.5B
500,000$25B$37.5B$50B$62.5B$75B
750,000$37.5B$56.25B$75B$93.75B$112.5B
1,000,000$50B$75B$100B$125B$150B
1,500,000$75B$112.5B$150B$187.5B$225B
2,000,000$100B$150B$200B$250B$300B
3,000,000$150B$225B$300B$375B$450B
4,000,000$200B$300B$400B$500B$600B
5,000,000$250B$375B$500B$625B$750B
6,000,000$300B$450B$600B$750B$900B

I will have more thoughts on today’s order. But it is definitely very bad news for Anthropic.

DOWNLOAD JUDGE ALSUP’S CLASS CERTIFICATION ORDER

Related Stories

Leave a Reply


Discover more from Chat GPT Is Eating the World

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading