-
Judge Tigar issues protective order for Nazemian, Dubus lawsuits v. NVIDIA
Read more: Judge Tigar issues protective order for Nazemian, Dubus lawsuits v. NVIDIAJudge Tigar issued the protective order related to discovery in the lawsuits for Nazemian and Dubus against NVIDIA. This is pretty standard for these cases.
-
Parties in Nazemian, Dubus v. NVIDIA submit case management statement
Read more: Parties in Nazemian, Dubus v. NVIDIA submit case management statementThe Nazemian and Dubus plaintiffs and NVIDIA submitted their case management statement to Judge Tigar. A preview of their fair use arguments: Plaintiffs’ PositionThe legal and factual issue at the core of this case is whether Defendant’s unlawful copying has violated the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 501, et seq. NVIDIA has indicated that it…
-
Updated the Master List of AI copyright lawsuits. Current total 38.
Read more: Updated the Master List of AI copyright lawsuits. Current total 38.New year, new list. We updated the Master List of Copyright Lawsuits against AI companies. The current total is 38 lawsuits, some of which are consolidated before the same judge and in the same proceeding. With our update, we changed the order of cases to start with the Northern District of California, which has the…
-
Copyright Clearance Center memo to New York Times re: CCC’s plan to offer rightsholders ability to license for AI training should remain under seal
Read more: Copyright Clearance Center memo to New York Times re: CCC’s plan to offer rightsholders ability to license for AI training should remain under sealIt looks the parties in the New York Times v. OpenAI lawsuit agree that a memo and an email that the Copyright Clearance Center sent to the New York Times should remain under seal. They are exhibits to OpenAI’s motion. You can learn more about CCC’s AI licensing program here. Said the New York Times:…
-
Judge Polk Failla schedules pre-motion conference for Jan. 14 in Dow Jones v. Perplexity
Read more: Judge Polk Failla schedules pre-motion conference for Jan. 14 in Dow Jones v. PerplexityORDER granting 39 Letter Motion for Conference. The Court is in receipt of Defendant’s letter requesting a pre-motion conference regarding its anticipated motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, to transfer this action to the Norther District of California. (Dkt. #39). The Court is also in receipt of Plaintiffs’ response in opposition. (Dkt. #40). In…
-
Updated Map of copyright lawsuits v. AI companies
Read more: Updated Map of copyright lawsuits v. AI companiesWe updated our map of all 38 U.S. copyright lawsuits against AI companies. The PDF below has clickable links to each docket and names of presiding judges. The symbols next to each case name represents the type of underlying works at issue:
-
Dow Jones lawyers file response to defendant Perplexity’s request for pre-motion conference
Read more: Dow Jones lawyers file response to defendant Perplexity’s request for pre-motion conferenceThe Plaintiffs in Dow Jones v. Perplexity filed their response to the defendant’s letter asking for a pre-motion conference regarding its planned motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, to transfer the case to the Northern District of California.
-
Judge Bibas revises date for pre-trial check-in in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS Intelligence
Read more: Judge Bibas revises date for pre-trial check-in in Thomson Reuters v. ROSS IntelligenceFrom Judge Bibas: “ORAL ORDER: I previously asked the parties to hold May 8, 2025. D.I. 756 . I now release that date and reserve May 5, 2025, and May 6, 2025. Ordered by Judge Stephanos Bibas on 12/31/2024. (jfm) (Entered: 12/31/2024).”